What is the level of evidence of what you are reading?

Martins, Renato Parsekian; Buschang, Peter H.

doi:10.1590/2176-9451.20.4.022-025.ebo

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Studies were selected provided that their evidence was related to the key questions were the latest or that can update the evidence table. Study designs corresponding to the top of the evidence pyramid (Meta analyses> systemic reviews> cohort studies>case-controlled studies) were primarily selected [10]. Consequently, six studies were included in this review.…”

Section: Search For Recent Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Developing evidence-based clinical imaging guidelines of justification for radiographic examination after dental implant installation

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: This study aimed to develop evidence-based clinical imaging guidelines to assess the proper implant location following implant surgery and identify potential complications during follow-up. Methods: The guideline development process employed an adaptation methodology in accordance with the Korean clinical imaging guidelines (K-CIG). Core (Ovid-Medline, Ovid-Embase, National Guideline Clearinghouse, and Guideline International Network) and domestic databases (KoreaMed, KMbase, and KoMGI) were searched used to retrieve guidelines, and two reviewers analyzed the retrieved articles. The articles were included in this review using well-established inclusion criteria. Results: Our online search identified 66 articles, of which 3 were selected for the development of the guidelines. Consequently, based on these three guidelines, we formulated distinct recommendations regarding the appropriate imaging modalities that should be used following implant placement. Conclusions: Conventional imaging (e.g., periapical or panoramic radiography) should be the first choice for assessing the implant following its placement and osseointegration. The metal artifacts in Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) should be considered. However, CBCT is recommended for patients with sensory abnormalities following dental implant surgery to evaluate and identify the underlying cause of implant complications and to determine the appropriate treatment.

show abstract

Section: Search For Recent Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Developing evidence-based clinical imaging guidelines of justification for radiographic examination after dental implant installation

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Developing evidence-based clinical imaging guidelines for the diagnosis of vertically fractured teeth

Kim,

Lee

et al. 2024

Oral Radiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives This study aimed to develop an evidence-based clinical imaging guideline for teeth suspected with vertical root fractures. Methods An adaptation methodology based on the Korean Clinical Imaging Guidelines (K-CIG) was used in the guideline development process. After searching for guidelines using major databases such as Ovid-Medline, Elsevier-Embase, National Guideline Clearinghouse, and Guideline International Network, as well as domestic databases such as KoreaMed, KMbase, and KoMGI, two reviewers analyzed the retrieved articles. The retrieved articles were included in this review using well-established inclusion criteria. Results Twenty articles were identified through an online search, of which three were selected for guideline development. Based on these three guidelines, this study developed specific recommendations concerning the optimal imaging modality for diagnosing teeth suspected of vertical root fractures. Conclusions Periapical radiography is the preferred method for assessing teeth with mastication-related pain and suspected vertical root fractures. However, if intraoral radiographs do not provide sufficient information about root fractures, a small FOV CBCT may be considered. However, the use of CBCT in endodontically treated teeth is significantly constrained by the presence of artificial shading.

show abstract

Basic concepts in research methodology and biostatistics for head and neck oncologists

Thankappan

2019

J Head Neck Physicians Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

What is the level of evidence of what you are reading?

Cited by 3 publications

References 4 publications

Developing evidence-based clinical imaging guidelines of justification for radiographic examination after dental implant installation

Developing evidence-based clinical imaging guidelines of justification for radiographic examination after dental implant installation

Developing evidence-based clinical imaging guidelines for the diagnosis of vertically fractured teeth

Basic concepts in research methodology and biostatistics for head and neck oncologists

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About