2015
DOI: 10.1590/1983-1447.2015.03.52432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The challenge of tobacco control at a university hospital

Abstract: Objective:To identify the actions taken by the Commission of Tobacco Control (CTC) to control smoking in the hospital environment. Methods: Descriptive and exploratory retrospective documentary research conducted at a university hospital in southern Brazil, in 2014. The content of the minutes of CTC meetings was used to create a database, and the rounds reports were descriptively analyzed. We sought to identify the most relevant actions from 2005 to 2014. Results: The CTC implemented the Tobacco-Free Environme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We included 105 references, published between 1993 and 2019, representing 75 unique studies, which described the development or implementation and evaluation of SF/TF university policies in various universities. As shown in Figure 2, most studies were conducted in North America (50/75, 66.7%), including the United States (46 studies), and Canada (4 studies: [9,[28][29][30][31]); one study was conducted in Brazil [32]; 10 studies (14.7%) were conducted in Asian countries, such as Japan (3 studies: [33][34][35]), China [36], South Korea [37], Taiwan [38], Vietnam [39], India [40], Pakistan [41], and Malaysia [42]; 4 studies came from Europe (Germany [43], Ireland [44][45][46], Switzerland [47], and Russia [48]); 6 from the Middle East and North Africa (Bahrain [49], Egypt [50], Israel [51], Lebanon [52], Saudi Arabia [53], and Sudan [54]; and 4 from Oceania (3 studies from Australia [55][56][57][58], 1 from New Zealand [59]). While the majority of the studies were of single universities, some reported case studies or analyses of multiple universities based in Australia [55], Canada [28], China [36], India [40], New Zealand [59], Russia…”
Section: Charting Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We included 105 references, published between 1993 and 2019, representing 75 unique studies, which described the development or implementation and evaluation of SF/TF university policies in various universities. As shown in Figure 2, most studies were conducted in North America (50/75, 66.7%), including the United States (46 studies), and Canada (4 studies: [9,[28][29][30][31]); one study was conducted in Brazil [32]; 10 studies (14.7%) were conducted in Asian countries, such as Japan (3 studies: [33][34][35]), China [36], South Korea [37], Taiwan [38], Vietnam [39], India [40], Pakistan [41], and Malaysia [42]; 4 studies came from Europe (Germany [43], Ireland [44][45][46], Switzerland [47], and Russia [48]); 6 from the Middle East and North Africa (Bahrain [49], Egypt [50], Israel [51], Lebanon [52], Saudi Arabia [53], and Sudan [54]; and 4 from Oceania (3 studies from Australia [55][56][57][58], 1 from New Zealand [59]). While the majority of the studies were of single universities, some reported case studies or analyses of multiple universities based in Australia [55], Canada [28], China [36], India [40], New Zealand [59], Russia…”
Section: Charting Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All studies reported information that allowed us to categorize the type of ban described or analyzed. Most studies described the institutionalization of total bans (43/75, 57.3%); 20 studies (26.7%) reported partial bans only; 10 studies (13.3%) reported a mix of partial and total bans, as they analyzed the situation in various institutions; the remaining 2 studies described a progressive policy development from a partial to a total ban in the same institution (one in Brazil [32] and one in Ireland [44][45][46]). A total of 8 studies (all published between 2016 and 2019 and all coming from the United States) specifically mentioned electronic cigarettes (or e-cigarettes) in the policy [69,[78][79][80][81][82][83][84]; only 3 studies looked at the prevalence of e-cigarette smoking before and after the introduction of a ban [79,80,84], reporting mixed results, with no changes [80], or an increase in e-cigarette consumption after adoption of a SF/TF policy [79,84].…”
Section: << Insert Table 1 About Here >>mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This requires tackling issues involved with Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2017;38(4):e2017-0027 the smoking habit during nurses' professional training and continuing education, in order to qualify nursing care for smokers and former smokers (20) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outras pesquisas versam sobre a necessidade de capacitação dos profissionais de saúde para atuar com as pessoas dependentes do tabaco, não apenas no nível de graduação (Poreddi et al, 2015;Petersen et al, 2017), mas também como atividade de educação permanente (Malan et al, 2015;Sarna et al, 2018;Králíková et al, 2017). Tal capacitação é vista como prerrogativa para despertar o profissional para a importância da abordagem desse público e, sobretudo, para o sucesso das ações de enfermagem (Cruz et al, 2015;Whitehead, Zucker, Stone, 2014).…”
Section: Considerações Iniciaisunclassified