2022
DOI: 10.1590/1982-3533.2022v31n3art02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Government political-relational capacities and industrial policy profile: Brazil’s experience at the beginning of the 21st Century

Abstract: Formulating industrial policies is a complex process marked by advances and setbacks, reflecting the political and institutional aspects. In the present article, we aim to better understand the role of government relational capacities in delineating the industrial policy profile. Based on a qualitative research on Brazilian industrial policies between 2003 and 2014, this study highlights how the interlocution and coordination between public and private actors are crucial in shaping the industrial policy profil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In economic terms, from 2003 to 2016, there was an explicit intention to invert toward reprimarization of the Brazilian economy, which was evident in establishing industrial policies. Although unable to achieve the desired goals, these policies were audacious in their content and intention (Fonseca et al, 2020; Queiroz‐Stein & Gugliano, 2022; Suzigan et al, 2020). In this context, neoextractivism was not an explicit government project but an unpremeditated consequence of structural factors, such as the rapid increase in China's demand for agricultural and mineral commodities.…”
Section: The Consequences Of Dismantling Environmental Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In economic terms, from 2003 to 2016, there was an explicit intention to invert toward reprimarization of the Brazilian economy, which was evident in establishing industrial policies. Although unable to achieve the desired goals, these policies were audacious in their content and intention (Fonseca et al, 2020; Queiroz‐Stein & Gugliano, 2022; Suzigan et al, 2020). In this context, neoextractivism was not an explicit government project but an unpremeditated consequence of structural factors, such as the rapid increase in China's demand for agricultural and mineral commodities.…”
Section: The Consequences Of Dismantling Environmental Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%