2016
DOI: 10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v36n2p260-270/2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon footprint of the colombian cocoa production

Abstract: ABSTRACT:Cocoa is an important commercial crop in the tropics; and estimating the carbon emissions in the producing-areas is a worthwhile effort. The main goal of the current paper was to evaluate the carbon footprint (CF) per kilogram of Colombian cocoa bean produced under conventional and agroforestry managements, following the methods proposed by PAS 2050. In this research, we compared our results to other worldwide researches, showing an overview of the current limitations and challenges involving the CF r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…found that the C footprint in coffee systems is influenced mainly by nitrogen fertility. Ortiz et al ., 103 evaluating potential GHG emissions from cocoa farms in Colombia, obtained emissions between 2.0 and 8.0 kg CO 2 eq kg −1 cocoa. Appropriate management of agricultural systems at the farm level can lead to C sequestration (biomass and soil), meaning a farm can lower its C footprint 14 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…found that the C footprint in coffee systems is influenced mainly by nitrogen fertility. Ortiz et al ., 103 evaluating potential GHG emissions from cocoa farms in Colombia, obtained emissions between 2.0 and 8.0 kg CO 2 eq kg −1 cocoa. Appropriate management of agricultural systems at the farm level can lead to C sequestration (biomass and soil), meaning a farm can lower its C footprint 14 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, coffee and cocoa on average have a carbon footprint of 8.3 (van Rikxoort, Schroth, Läderach, & Rodríguez‐Sánchez, 2014) and 8.0 kg CO 2 e/kg (Ortiz‐Rodríguez, Villamizar‐Gallardo, Naranjo‐Merino, García‐Caceres, & Castañeda‐galvís, 2016). However, different management practices, such as the diversification of crops within a farm or the inclusion of a diverse set of shade tree species, can reduce their carbon footprint (van Rikxoort et al, 2014).…”
Section: Towards a Sustainable Superfood Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, a departure from monocrop exploitations to more diverse systems where multiple crops are produced, and particularly agroforestry systems that include shade tree species, might be an opportunity to ensure win–win scenarios for agricultural production and biodiversity, while safeguarding the long‐term sustainability of the production. Although agroforestry practices also need improvement in order to decrease their impact, including their emissions, for example a comparison between conventional and agroforestry cocoa systems in Colombia showed they had equivalent CO 2 emissions (Ortiz‐Rodríguez et al, 2016).…”
Section: Towards a Sustainable Superfood Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gama-Rodrigues et al 2011;van Rikxoort et al 2014). It is highly debated whether the production of cacao is associated with net GHG emissions or net storage of carbon (Ortiz-Rodriguez et al 2016;Defra 2009;Schroth et al 2016;Montagnini and Nair 2004). On the one hand, forest conversion to cacao land, burning organic material, a common practice in current cacao production systems, and applying fertiliser is associated with GHG emissions (Ledo et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emissions calculated for GAP of 2.29 kg CO 2 e per kg beans cacao for a yield of 1184 kg ha -1 also fall within the range. Available studies report a net emission of GHGs per kilogram of cacao beans produced between 0.32 and 42 kg CO 2 e per kilogram of cacao(Recanti et al 2018;Ntiamoah and Afrane 2008;Ortiz- Rodriguez et al 2016;Harris et al 2015;Konstantas et al 2018;Defra 2009;Schroth et al 2016) but they rarely relate these emissions explicitly to the level of cacao beans produced. Looking closer to the studies we will try to explain the differences.Ortiz-Rodriguez et al (…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%