1981
DOI: 10.1590/1809-43921981111125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patologia de peixes da Amazônia Brasileira, 1. Aspectos gerais

Abstract: Patologia de peixes da Amazônia Brasileira, 1. Aspectos gera1sResumo Alguns aspectos gerais da patologia de peixes ama· zônicos são apresentados, e os princípios que governam as doenças em peixes mencionados, tais como : a) peixes amazônicos estão pouco expostos à poluição in· dustrial, mas podem ocorrer mortalidades grandes provocadas pela combinação de quedas na temperat ura am· biental e a decomposição de matéria vegetal; b) os peixes que morrem primeiro são aqueles que têm in· fecções nas brânquias; c) dev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
15
1
4

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
1
15
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Many parasites can live on the host without causing any damage (THATCHER, 1981). In the present study, ectoparasitism by Monogenea did not alter the hematological parameters of H. malabaricus.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…Many parasites can live on the host without causing any damage (THATCHER, 1981). In the present study, ectoparasitism by Monogenea did not alter the hematological parameters of H. malabaricus.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…Metacercariae of Clinostomum marginatum (Rudolphi, 1819) were found in the fins of G. brasiliensis. There are previous records of this parasite in other species of cichlids such as Cichla ocellaris (Bloch & Schneider, 1801) and Crenicichla sp., in their gills, skin and fins (THATCHER, 1981). Clinostomum sp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…inquirenda and G. agostinhoi (described in PAVANELLI & REGO 1989, 1991and PAVANELU & SANTOS 1991 were re-evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM): metascoleces were absent consequently they cannot be classified as Goezeella. One genus is proposed, Chambriella gen.n.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%