2022
DOI: 10.1590/1809-43412022v19d704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

¿Antropología internacional o Antropologías del Mundo? La encuesta mundial de práctica antropológica-GSAP vista desde Argentina

Abstract: Resumen El Consejo Mundial de Asociaciones de Antropología (WCAA sus siglas en inglés) realizó entre 2017 y 2018 una encuesta global (Global Survey of Anthropological Practice-GSAP) para dar cuenta de la práctica antropológica en aquellos países que cuentan con asociaciones miembro de WCAA. En el siguiente artículo se compartirán los resultados de la GSAP para Argentina, enmarcados en una encuesta previa realizada por el Colegio de Graduados en Antropología de la República Argentina en 2016 que nos ayuda a ilu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The texts cover a variety of themes in the different national settings included in the survey (on its general aspects, see MacGrath, Accaioli, Millard, Metzner, Nešković & Vucinic, 2022). In this dossier we find a detailed reflection on specific scenarios like those of Brazil (Rial & Machado, 2022) Argentina (Ferrero, 2022) and China, including Hong Kong (Fan, 2022;Mathews, 2022), among others, as well as broader aspects present across multiple spaces.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The texts cover a variety of themes in the different national settings included in the survey (on its general aspects, see MacGrath, Accaioli, Millard, Metzner, Nešković & Vucinic, 2022). In this dossier we find a detailed reflection on specific scenarios like those of Brazil (Rial & Machado, 2022) Argentina (Ferrero, 2022) and China, including Hong Kong (Fan, 2022;Mathews, 2022), among others, as well as broader aspects present across multiple spaces.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%