2018
DOI: 10.1590/1809-43412018v15n2a406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tapeba: a synthesis of historical ethnography of ethnic territory and subjects

Abstract: This article summarizes ingredients from previous writings to undertake an ethnography of the process of constitution of the Tabeba ethnic territory, in Caucaia, in the Greater Fortaleza Metropolitan Region, until its recent recognition as an Indigenous Land by the Brazilian government. Considering my ethnographic experience and the various forms of engagement that I have had since the mid-1980s, I describe and analyze the constitution of the Tapebas as a collective political subject and the formalization of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While in Africa there was --and still is --an often fragmented struggle between indigenous groups and other social segments concerning policies for the creation of "native states", indigenous groups in Brazil are a distinct minority (Castro, Josué, 2008). In the period of democratization consolidated in the 1988 Constitution, anthropologists who studied indigenous and quilombola communities focused almost inexorably on the indigenous rights that needed to be recognized by the State (Barretto Filho, 2018;Barretto Filho and Ramos, 2019;and O 'Dwyer and Silva, 2020). They often became "cultural mediators", in the words of Roberto Cardoso de Oliveira (2006).…”
Section: From the Attack On Anthropology To The Challenges Facing Antmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in Africa there was --and still is --an often fragmented struggle between indigenous groups and other social segments concerning policies for the creation of "native states", indigenous groups in Brazil are a distinct minority (Castro, Josué, 2008). In the period of democratization consolidated in the 1988 Constitution, anthropologists who studied indigenous and quilombola communities focused almost inexorably on the indigenous rights that needed to be recognized by the State (Barretto Filho, 2018;Barretto Filho and Ramos, 2019;and O 'Dwyer and Silva, 2020). They often became "cultural mediators", in the words of Roberto Cardoso de Oliveira (2006).…”
Section: From the Attack On Anthropology To The Challenges Facing Antmentioning
confidence: 99%