2018
DOI: 10.1590/1808-1657000732017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glyphosate, isolated or in associations, at agronomic performance and seed quality of the RR®2 soybean

Abstract: The “second generation” of glyphosate-tolerant soybean (RR®2 soybean) was developed through a different technique of insertion of the glyphosate-insensitive EPSPs gene. Information on the selectivity of glyphosate, alone or in combination, in RR2 soybean is lacking. This study evaluated the effects of glyphosate, isolated or in associations, applied at post-emergence (V4), at agronomic performance and seed quality of soybean cultivar NS 6700 IPRO (RR2). The experimental design was randomized block with four re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Application of ACCase inhibitors in association with the broadleaf herbicides 2,4-D, triclopyr, dicamba, carfentrazone, saflufenacil and chlorimuron had no effect on soybean seed quality. Some studies reported negative effects for post-emergent chlorimuron application in soybean, especially visible injuries (FORNAZZA et al, 2018;SILVA et al, 2018b), but without altering seed quality (SILVA et al, 2018b), as observed in the present study. Although synthetic auxins can compromise emergence in the subsequent soybean crop (FRANCISCHINI et al, 2020;PERES-OLIVEIRA et al, 2020), there are generally no negative effects when the label-recommended time between application and planting is followed, as evident in seed quality in the present study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Application of ACCase inhibitors in association with the broadleaf herbicides 2,4-D, triclopyr, dicamba, carfentrazone, saflufenacil and chlorimuron had no effect on soybean seed quality. Some studies reported negative effects for post-emergent chlorimuron application in soybean, especially visible injuries (FORNAZZA et al, 2018;SILVA et al, 2018b), but without altering seed quality (SILVA et al, 2018b), as observed in the present study. Although synthetic auxins can compromise emergence in the subsequent soybean crop (FRANCISCHINI et al, 2020;PERES-OLIVEIRA et al, 2020), there are generally no negative effects when the label-recommended time between application and planting is followed, as evident in seed quality in the present study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In glyphosate-tolerant soybeans, this herbicide compromises seed quality, particularly when applied in the reproductive stage (ALBRECHT et al, 2012). However, Silva et al (2018b) reported no negative effects on soybean seed quality or other parameters for ACCase, clethodim or fluazifop combined with post-emergent glyphosate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On this occasion, the number of branches and the number of pods were also counted in five plants per plot. The application of chlorimuron can cause injuries to soybeans, especially when applied post-emergence of soybeans (Cesco et al 2018;Silva et al 2018a). For pre-emergence application, injury in soybeans is less common, but can also be observed, but in general without compromising agronomic performance (Belfry et al 2015;Priess et al 2020), as observed in the present study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…With the example of soybean expressing the cp4epsps gene, more research was carried out into the crop. It has been suggested that glyphosate may have a negative effect on several soybean parameters (ALBRECHT et al, 2018;SILVA et al, 2018). In various studies into RR2 maize, undesirable effects following glyphosate application, alone or in mixtures, were also detected: these included changes in the nutrient content of the leaves (OSÓRIO et al, 2015), plant height and reduced growth (ALBRECHT et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%