2016
DOI: 10.1590/1808-057x201602280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The unidirectional relationship between consumer confidence and PSI-20 returns - The influence of the economic cycle

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to determine the relationship between market sentiment and rates of return on the main Portuguese benchmark and verify whether this relationship is influenced by different economic cycles. Given the subjectivity inherent to the use of variables capturing investor sentiment, the Consumer Confidence Index (CCI) was used as a benchmark. To achieve the proposed objective, an analysis of time series stationarity, Pearson correlation, and Granger causality using the autoregressive vectors mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The research closer to the aim of the present study were developed in international markets and mainly focus on the analysis of the relationship between sentiment and return on assets, mostly identifying a positive and significant relationship between these variables (Baker & Wrugler, 2006, 2007Garcia, 2013;Neves et al, 2016;Piccoli et al, 2018). However, more recently, the focus has shifted to understand the role of investor sentiment in the volatility return (Aydogan, 2017;Kumari & Mahakud, 2015;Lee et al, 2002;Smales, 2016;Schneller et al, 2018;Yu & Yuan, 2011), which is the purpose of this study.…”
Section: Previous Studies and Research Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The research closer to the aim of the present study were developed in international markets and mainly focus on the analysis of the relationship between sentiment and return on assets, mostly identifying a positive and significant relationship between these variables (Baker & Wrugler, 2006, 2007Garcia, 2013;Neves et al, 2016;Piccoli et al, 2018). However, more recently, the focus has shifted to understand the role of investor sentiment in the volatility return (Aydogan, 2017;Kumari & Mahakud, 2015;Lee et al, 2002;Smales, 2016;Schneller et al, 2018;Yu & Yuan, 2011), which is the purpose of this study.…”
Section: Previous Studies and Research Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 96%
“…According to Baker and Wurgler (2007), another factor that can contribute to the occurrence of mispricing is the limitation of rational arbitrage, especially in short-term horizons. The latter can be associated with costs and negotiation risks generated by demand pressures and the incorporation in prices of uncertain factors, captured by investor sentiment, allowing a deviation from fundamental analysis (Neves, Gonçalves, Ribeiro, Feiteira, & Viseu, 2016). Likewise, companies with characteristics associated with difficult pricing, such as a smaller size, high growth rate, and low stock liquidity, have limitations for arbitration and greater difficulty in the pricing of their assets (Baker & Wurgler, 2006, 2007Piccoli et al, 2018).…”
Section: Mispricing and Investor Sentimentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feeling measures can be classified as explicit or implicit, regarding the way the indicator is obtained. It is explicit when it derives directly from a direct questionnaire, and it is implicit when it is obtained from indirect information (Neves et al ., 2016).…”
Section: Theoretical Frame Of Referencementioning
confidence: 99%