“…Therefore, it can be perceived that the sociological perspective (SAP) and economic perspective (DC) of strategic management can enrich each other (Baum & Dobbin, 2000) and various academics have encouraged associations between diverse approaches of this strategy (Amit & Schoemaker, 1993;Johnson, Melin, & Whittington, 2003;Peteraf, 2005). However, even though recent research contemplates new findings about DC and learning ISSN 1678-6971 (electronic version) • RAM, São Paulo, 21(5), eRAMR200153, 2020 doi:10.1590/1678-6971/eRAMR200153 (Tallott & Hilliard, 2016;Meira, Machado, & Gomes, 2019), DC and routines (Wohlgemuth & Wenzel, 2015;Garcia, 2017), SAP and routines (Feldman, 2015), and SAP, learning and routines (Silva & Lucena, 2015), there is no evidence of studies that have adopted, together, practices, learning and routines to understand the DC development process. Besides this, Belmondo and Roussel (2014) point out that the inter-relationship between praxis and practice, intrinsic to strategizing, is not clear, suggesting new research that evaluates if the connecting element to fill in this gap could be in routines.…”