2014
DOI: 10.1590/1807-55092014000200211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efeito do número de jogadores sobre a demanda física e respostas fisiológicas durante jogos com campo reduzido em jogadores de futebol sub-15

Abstract: O objetivo do estudo foi verificar o efeito do número de jogadores em jogos com campo reduzido (JCRs) sobre a demanda física e as respostas fisiológicas em jogadores adolescentes de futebol. Para isso, 14 jogadores de uma equipe de nível estadual (idade 14,4 ± 0,5 anos; massa corporal 56,2 ± 7,0 kg; estatura 1,7 ± 0,1 m; IMC 20,3 ± 1,4 kg∙m-2) foram submetidos a dois formatos (3 vs 3 e 7 vs 7) de JCRs. Foram analisadas as repostas de frequência cardíaca (FC), percepção subjetiva de esforço (PSE) e lactato sang… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Soccer is a collective sport of the intermittent type, and makes high demands on energy, due to the motor actions undertaken, which vary in intensity and duration during the game (Pedro, Machado, & Nakamura, 2014). Its technical-tactical actions do not have a constant pattern during the games, as a result of which the motor activities during the match are abruptly interrupted and then re-begun various times in a random manner (Müller, Garganta, Santos, & Teoldo, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soccer is a collective sport of the intermittent type, and makes high demands on energy, due to the motor actions undertaken, which vary in intensity and duration during the game (Pedro, Machado, & Nakamura, 2014). Its technical-tactical actions do not have a constant pattern during the games, as a result of which the motor activities during the match are abruptly interrupted and then re-begun various times in a random manner (Müller, Garganta, Santos, & Teoldo, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%