2017
DOI: 10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v21n4p261-266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oat yield through panicle components and growth regulator

Abstract: The growth regulator modifies the expression of lodging and panicle components in oat plants, with reflexes in yield. The objective of this study was to define the optimal dose of growth regulator in oat for a maximum lodging of 5%. In addition, this study aimed to identify potential variables of the panicle to compose the multiple linear regression model and the simulation of grain yield in conditions of use of the regulator under low, high and very high fertilization with nitrogen. The study was conducted in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The productive potential of cereals is influenced by the efficiency of absorption, remobilization and use of nitrogen, so that grain productivity is significantly increased by the proper management of the nutrient (Beche et al, 2014;Silva et al, 2016). In oat culture, panicle mass is the most effective in showing change, either because of the variability of cultivars or management that interferes with productivity (Kurek et al, 2002;Marolli et al, 2017). Mantai et al (2020a) used relative contribution analysis and observed that in oat culture panicle mass, panicle spikelet number and panicle grain mass have a greater contribution in promoting changes by increasing nitrogen.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The productive potential of cereals is influenced by the efficiency of absorption, remobilization and use of nitrogen, so that grain productivity is significantly increased by the proper management of the nutrient (Beche et al, 2014;Silva et al, 2016). In oat culture, panicle mass is the most effective in showing change, either because of the variability of cultivars or management that interferes with productivity (Kurek et al, 2002;Marolli et al, 2017). Mantai et al (2020a) used relative contribution analysis and observed that in oat culture panicle mass, panicle spikelet number and panicle grain mass have a greater contribution in promoting changes by increasing nitrogen.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibility of analyzing the behavior and simulations of the nutrient in the productivity biomass and grains can qualify more efficient and sustainable managements (Costa et al, 2018;Mamann et al, 2020). The definition of the N-fertilizer dose is a function of the organic matter content of the soil, the previous crop and the grain yield expectations (Mantai et al, 2016;Marolli et al, 2017). On the other hand, the most propitious time for top dressing falls only on the phenology of the plant linked to the period of greatest nutrient demand for the formation of yield components (Bredemeier et al, 2013;Pereira et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the most propitious time for top dressing falls only on the phenology of the plant linked to the period of greatest nutrient demand for the formation of yield components (Bredemeier et al, 2013;Pereira et al, 2018). The technical indications for wheat and oats in Brazil recommend the fertilization time between the beginning of the tillering (stage V 3 ) and the beginning of the elongation (stage V 6 ), an interval around 30 to 60 days after plant emergence (Arenhardt et al, 2015;Marolli et al, 2017). In oats, Mantai et al (2015) state that the maximum efficiency of nitrogen fertilization in top dressing is obtained when applied at the stage of 3 to 4 leaves with the total dose supplied from 70 to 90 kg ha -1 of nitrogen, this variation being dependent on the temperature and moisture conditions of the soil at the time of fertilization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lodging leads to losses in grain yield and quality and difficulties at harvest (Chavarria et al, 2015;Krysczun et al, 2017). In an effort to minimize lodging, the use of growth regulators in crops such as crotalaria (Kappes et al, 2011;Araújo et al, 2018), rice (Alvarez et al, 2014;Goes et al, 2015), wheat (Schwerz et al, 2015;Ferreira et al, 2017) and oats (Guerreiro and Oliveira, 2012;Hawerroth et al, 2015;Marolli, et al, 2017b) has been studied. These regulators are chemical compounds that reduce the length of the inter-nodes by obstructing the biosynthesis of gibberellic acid, making the plant smaller in size and thickening the stem, favoring yield with significant reduction or even absence of lodging (Kaspary et al, 2015;Fagherazzi et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%