Self-Estimated functional inability because of pain questionnaire for workers: a reliability and construct validity study

Melo, Josane Soares Pinto; Dibai‐Filho, Almir Vieira; Oliveira, Cassiane Mendes; Pinheiro, Cezar Augusto Brito; Rocha, Daniel Santos; Santana, Gabriela Nascimento de; Gomes, Cid André Fidelis de Paula; Bassi‐Dibai, Daniela

doi:10.1590/1806-9282.20210681

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 15 publications

(23 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There are five possible answers for each, and the total score varies between 0 and 56 points; the higher the score, the greater the disability and pain. This instrument presents suitable measurement properties for Brazilian Portuguese [ 2 , 16 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Work Role Functioning Questionnaire 2.0 into Brazilian Portuguese in a general population

Melo

Dibai‐Filho

Rêgo

et al. 2022

Health Qual Life Outcomes

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The Work Role Functioning Questionnaire 2.0 (WRFQ 2.0) is an instrument that measures the difficulties perceived by workers in meeting work demands, given their physical or emotional health, but it has not yet been adapted for Brazil. Thus, this study aimed to translate, cross-culturally adapt and assess the psychometric properties of the WRFQ 2.0 into Brazilian Portuguese. Methods This is an observational study. Initially, translation and cross-cultural adaptation into Brazilian Portuguese was carried out. After that, this version was submitted to an evaluation of its internal structure. The internal consistency and test–retest reliability were assessed. To determine the construct validity, Spearman's correlation coefficient (rho) was used to determine the magnitude of correlation between the WRFQ 2.0 and the Work Ability Index (WAI), Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and Self -Estimated Functional Inability because of Pain (SEFIP-work). Results The internal structure with five domains and 27 items presented adequate fit indices for the Brazilian version of the WRFQ 2.0. Adequate correlations of the five domains of the WRFQ 2.0 with the NPRS, WAI and SEFIP-work were found (rho ranged between 0.145 and 0.338). The test–retest reliability of the WRFQ 2.0 ranged from substantial to excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥ 0.785) and internal consistency was adequate (Cronbach's alpha ≥ 0.852). Conclusion The Brazilian Portuguese version of the WRFQ 2.0 presents valid internal structure with five domains and 27 items, adequate construct based on correlations with other instruments, and acceptable test–retest reliability and internal consistency.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%