2018
DOI: 10.1590/1679-78254609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Element Simulation of Interlaminar and Intralaminar Damage in Laminated Composite Plates Subjected to Impact

Abstract: Here In this study, the composite laminates subjected to transverse impact with consideration interlaminar and intralaminar damage based on Cohesive Zone Model (CZM) and Progressive Damage Model (PDM) are investigated by numerical analysis using ABAQUS commercial finite element code. The delamination in stacking ply with the same fiber orientation is considered as interlaminar damage and the delamination in an inner layer of any cluster is ignored. Hashin criterion is used for intralaminar damage initiation an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To sum up, the cohesive elements approach gives more control over simulations and more possibilities, but the cohesive surface approach can be as good as the cohesive element and often is far more effective in terms of time and complexity. For example, Soroush et al (Soroush et al 2018) indicate that threedimensional analysis using cohesive surfaces decreases computational significantly. A three-dimensional analysis can capture the nonlinear progression of delamination front (through the width of the specimen) (Alfano and Crisfield 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To sum up, the cohesive elements approach gives more control over simulations and more possibilities, but the cohesive surface approach can be as good as the cohesive element and often is far more effective in terms of time and complexity. For example, Soroush et al (Soroush et al 2018) indicate that threedimensional analysis using cohesive surfaces decreases computational significantly. A three-dimensional analysis can capture the nonlinear progression of delamination front (through the width of the specimen) (Alfano and Crisfield 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A three-dimensional analysis can capture the nonlinear progression of delamination front (through the width of the specimen) (Alfano and Crisfield 2001). Examples of three-dimensional analysis of delamination can be found in Alfano and Crisfield (2001); Alfano et al (2007); Bieniaś et al (2017), and in Soroush et al (2018); Alfano and Crisfield (2001) for a cohesive surface approach. In a two dimensional analysis, the crack front progression is assumed to be the same through the specimen width.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…18 Finite element analysis (FEA) is a numerical model that has been widely used in the study and prediction of failure in composite materials. Finite element analysis can predict and analyze either interfacial damage initiation and progression using cohesive zone modeling (CZM), 19 fiber damage initiation, and evolution using the Hashin damage criteria, 20 or generally the stress–strain response of composites. 19-23 FEA has also been applied in the analysis of nano and micro-fiber reinforced composites, 24 whereby they used the shear lag model to predict interfacial shear strength in nanocomposites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various aspects of modeling low velocity transverse impact were discussed in. [ 10–15 ] The validity of several techniques for modelling a transverse impact was analyzed by Khalili et al [ 10 ] when focusing on the finite element type, impactor model, and solver type. Tita et al [ 11 ] and Sellitto et al [ 12 ] show that the 3D stress state of the solid elements gives more accurate predictions of the experimental tests in comparison with models with shell elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%