2018
DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maxillomandibular giant osteosclerotic lesions

Abstract: Giant Osteosclerotic Lesions (GOLs) are a group of rarely reported intraosseous lesions. Their precise diagnosis is important since they can be confused with malignant neoplasms. Objective This retrospective study aimed to record and analyze the clinical and radiographic Giant Osteosclerotic Lesions (GOLs) detected in the maxillomandibular area of patients attending to our institution. Materials and Methods: Informed consent from the patients was obtained and those cases of 2.5 cm or larger lesions with radiop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The size of the lesion should not be influencing factor in differential diagnosis of such condition, as in our study it ranged between 2 -15.6 mm in one dimension, which was comparable to other studies that showed that size (4,20,24) , or even bigger (5,6,25,26) . The essential point is lack of clinical signs and symptoms such as pain, numbness, or swelling as well as absence of radiographic features like bone expansion, root resorption, loss of lamina dura, or displacement of mandibular canal.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The size of the lesion should not be influencing factor in differential diagnosis of such condition, as in our study it ranged between 2 -15.6 mm in one dimension, which was comparable to other studies that showed that size (4,20,24) , or even bigger (5,6,25,26) . The essential point is lack of clinical signs and symptoms such as pain, numbness, or swelling as well as absence of radiographic features like bone expansion, root resorption, loss of lamina dura, or displacement of mandibular canal.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…3,18,44 There are many factors in the etiology of condensing osteitis such as deep caries, extensive restorations, inadequate root canal treatments, orthodontic forces, dental eruption and fixed prostheses. 5,19 The incidence of condensing osteitis was found between 0.6-33% in studies conducted. 14,20 In our study, the incidence of condensing osteitis was found to be 2.27%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the majority of cases, these lesions are solitary, but rare cases of multiple and sometimes bilateral and symmetrical cases have been reported [10]. The density of osteosclerosis may vary, and its appearance is generally uniform in some ground-glass areas [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%