2016
DOI: 10.1590/1678-457x.02016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of carbon monoxide treatment before vacuum packaging on the physical parameters and consumer evaluations of raw beef

Abstract: This study examined the color changes of packaged beef due to the effects of carbon monoxide exposure before vacuum packing and storage time, as well as consumers' evaluations of that beef. In the experiment, 400 striploin steaks (M. longissimus dorsi) were vacuum packed or after 48 hours of exposure to different concentrations of CD (0.1%, 0.3%, and 0.5%) vacuum packed. The color measurements and consumer evaluations were conducted after 7, 10, 14, 17, and 21 days of storage in the dark at 2 ± 1 °C. Consumers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no significant correlation between the consumer assessment and the brightness of steaks. Similar results were obtained in a study by Sakowska et al (), who evaluated the effects of treatment using three different concentrations of carbon monoxide (0.1, 0.3, and 0.5%) prior to vacuum packing and found a strong relation of redness ( r > 0.8) and yellowness ( r > 0.7) of steaks with the attractiveness and desire to purchase as assessed by consumers. In contrast, Holman et al () observed that only L * and b * were related to the consumer opinion on beef color acceptance.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There was no significant correlation between the consumer assessment and the brightness of steaks. Similar results were obtained in a study by Sakowska et al (), who evaluated the effects of treatment using three different concentrations of carbon monoxide (0.1, 0.3, and 0.5%) prior to vacuum packing and found a strong relation of redness ( r > 0.8) and yellowness ( r > 0.7) of steaks with the attractiveness and desire to purchase as assessed by consumers. In contrast, Holman et al () observed that only L * and b * were related to the consumer opinion on beef color acceptance.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…There was no significant correlation between the consumer assessment and the brightness of steaks. Similar results were obtained in a study by Sakowska et al (2016b), who evaluated the effects of treatment using three different concentrations of carbon monoxide (0.1, 0.3, and 0.5%) prior FIG URE 5 The photographs of selected samples in different packaging conditions after 7 and 21 days of storage. Vac, traditional vacuum packaging; CO-Vac, 0.5% CO, 30% CO 2 , 69.5% N 2 in MAP for 48 hr, then Vac; CO-MAP, 0.5% CO, 30% CO 2 , 69.5% N 2 in MAP to vacuum packing and found a strong relation of redness (r > 0.8) and…”
Section: Visual Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Low O 2 (essentially no oxygen) MAP may be used as a barrier package with an anoxic atmosphere of N 2 (70-80%) and CO 2 (20-30%) with the addition of a small concentration of carbon monoxide (CO). Anaerobic gas mixtures characterized by low concentration of carbon monoxide (CO) have been largely studied [12][13][14]. The inclusion of CO provides several advantages, for example, avoiding the undesirable effects of discolouration [13,15], a better flavour acceptability [16], no bone darkening [17], no premature browning [18], and generally increased beef tenderness (especially with O 2 levels under 40-50% O 2 ) and acceptability by consumers [19,20].…”
Section: Map Conditioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ⊿E value was evaluated according to the criteria used in the study by Sakowska et al . (): 0.0–0.5, not noticeable; 0.5–1.5, slightly noticeable; 1.5–3.0, noticeable; 3.0–6.0, very visible; > 6.0, extremely visible.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ⊿L*: difference of L* values, ⊿a*: difference of a* values and ⊿b*: difference of b* values. The ⊿E value was evaluated according to the criteria used in the study by Sakowska et al (2016): 0.0-0.5, not noticeable; 0.5-1.5, slightly noticeable; 1.5-3.0, noticeable; 3.0-6.0, very visible; > 6.0, extremely visible.…”
Section: Chemical Composition and Calpain Activity Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%