2016
DOI: 10.1111/jfpe.12517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of 0.5% carbon monoxide in modified atmosphere packagings on selected quality attributes of M. Longissimus dorsi beef steaks

Abstract: This study evaluated the effects of the periods of 0.5% CO exposure in two modified atmosphere packagings (MAP) with gas composition of 0.5% CO, 30% CO2 and 69.5% N2, as compared with conventional vacuum packaging (Vac) on the quality of packaged beef steaks (M. longissimus dorsi) stored for 21 days at 2 °C. In the first MAP solution, the beef steaks were packed in the MAP for 48 hr and then repacked in vacuum packaging (CO‐Vac), while beef steaks were packed in the MAP (CO‐MAP) in the second solution. Results… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar trend following depletion of CO penetration depth was reported by others (Jayasingh, Cornforth, Carpenter, & Whittier, 2001;Sakowska, Guzek, Glabska, & Wierzbicka, 2016). Sakowska, Guzek, Sun, and Wierzbicka (2016), investigated a range of CO pretreatments (0.1%-0.5%) applied to beef steaks for 48 h prior to vacuum packaging and obtained a CO penetration depth of 0.0-2.0 mm after 21 d for 0.1%-0.5% CO pretreatment, respectively. Jayasingh et al (2001) also reported that for 5% CO pretreated vacuum packed beef steaks the COMB layer disappeared after 3 weeks storage.…”
Section: Comb Depthsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar trend following depletion of CO penetration depth was reported by others (Jayasingh, Cornforth, Carpenter, & Whittier, 2001;Sakowska, Guzek, Glabska, & Wierzbicka, 2016). Sakowska, Guzek, Sun, and Wierzbicka (2016), investigated a range of CO pretreatments (0.1%-0.5%) applied to beef steaks for 48 h prior to vacuum packaging and obtained a CO penetration depth of 0.0-2.0 mm after 21 d for 0.1%-0.5% CO pretreatment, respectively. Jayasingh et al (2001) also reported that for 5% CO pretreated vacuum packed beef steaks the COMB layer disappeared after 3 weeks storage.…”
Section: Comb Depthsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This result is in agreement with previous findings by Van Rooyen, Allen, Crawley, and O'Connor (2017) that varying exposure time to CO pretreatment had no effect on meat tenderness (P > .05). Likewise Sakowska, Guzek, Sun, and Wierzbicka (2016) reported no differences (P > .05) in WBSF values when comparing 0.5% CO pretreated beef steaks to vacuum packed or CO-MAP beef steaks after 21 d storage, suggesting CO had very little effect on tenderness. A significant storage day effect occurred (P < .001) for both models (Tables 2 & 3) as expected due to the wet ageing process (vacuum packaging) and increase in proteolysis.…”
Section: Warner Bratzler Shear Forcementioning
confidence: 94%
“…In contrast, the addition of 0.4% CO to either 20% or 80% O 2 atmospheres did not increase the MetMb reducing activity in five beef muscles [ 132 ]. Recently, Sakowska et al [ 124 ] found that CO-MAP packaging systems significantly increased redness of beef steaks during storage for 21 days. Sausages packaged under CO discolored faster during air and light display than sausages treated with nitrite.…”
Section: Co In Fresh Meat Packagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…European consumers preferred beef steaks in low CO-MAP. Despite the current EU prohibition of MAP with CO [ 124 ], the decision to ban the use of this gas in the EU should be reconsidered. Sørheim et al [ 54 ] found the application of low concentrations of CO to meat packaging systems to have no toxic effects evident.…”
Section: Could the Application Of Co For Meat Packaging Be Re-consmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have investigated applying a range of CO pretreatments prior to vacuum packaging (Clark, Lentz, & Roth, 1976;Rozbeh, Kalchayanand, Field, & Johnson, 1993;Brewer & Wu, 1993;Jayasingh et al, 2001;Sakowska, Guzek, Glabska et al, 2016;Sakowska, Guzek, Sun, & Wierzbicka, 2016;. However, in general it appears that reduced CO concentrations require extended exposure periods or vice versa.…”
Section: A* Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%