2017
DOI: 10.1590/1678-4499.298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prohexadione calcium reduces vegetative growth and increases fruit set of ‘Smith’ pear trees, in Southern Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Carra et al (2016), studying the effect of the application of increasing doses of PCa on 'Le Conte' pears, reported that PCa did not influence fruit yield, soluble solids content, titratable acidity, and average fruit mass, even at doses high as 400 mg•L -1 . Carra et al (2017a) reported the same behavior for 'Smith' pear trees, in which fruit quality and yield were not influenced by the use of PCa, even with reapplication of the doses. However, Carra et al (2017b) observed that 'Shinseiki' pear trees were influenced by the application of PCa, in which the fruit yield decreased in the trees treated with 600 mg•L -1 PCa, whereas the dose of 300 mg•L -1 has not differed from the control; the quality parameters of the pears were not influenced by the PCa dose.…”
Section: Experiments With 'Packham's Triumph' Pearsmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Carra et al (2016), studying the effect of the application of increasing doses of PCa on 'Le Conte' pears, reported that PCa did not influence fruit yield, soluble solids content, titratable acidity, and average fruit mass, even at doses high as 400 mg•L -1 . Carra et al (2017a) reported the same behavior for 'Smith' pear trees, in which fruit quality and yield were not influenced by the use of PCa, even with reapplication of the doses. However, Carra et al (2017b) observed that 'Shinseiki' pear trees were influenced by the application of PCa, in which the fruit yield decreased in the trees treated with 600 mg•L -1 PCa, whereas the dose of 300 mg•L -1 has not differed from the control; the quality parameters of the pears were not influenced by the PCa dose.…”
Section: Experiments With 'Packham's Triumph' Pearsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Considering the relative growth, each PCa dose had a better performance than the control; higher doses yielded lower relative growths. Carra et al (2017a), who evaluated the application of PCa in 'Smith' pear trees at the doses of zero, 100, 200, 300, and 400 mg•L -1 , reported a linear inverse trend between the PCa dose and the length of the plant branches. Pasa and Einhorn (2017) also reported a reduction of average branch length for 'Starkrimson' pear trees, from 55.1 cm in the control to 38.9 cm in trees treated with 250 mg•L -1 PCa.…”
Section: Experiments With 'Packham's Triumph' Pearsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the both years application concentrations on pH had no difference from control (Table 2). In the 'Smith' pear, Pro-Ca had no effect on SSC, TA, pH and firmness (Carra et al, 2017). Moreover, Çetinbaş et al (2015) reported that in 'Starkrimson' apple, Pro-Ca had no negative or positive effect on these fruit quality.…”
Section: Yield and Fruit Qualitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In 2018, it was determined that the angle increases with the Pro-Ca concentrations increase as well, and the widest angle was in the use of 250 g 100 L -1 (Figure 1D). Studies regarding the Pro-Ca were generally carried out to bring under control the vegetative development of the species such as apples (Schupp et al, 2003;Karlovic et al, 2004;Greene, 2008;Duyvelshoff and Cline, 2013;Çetinbaş et al / HortiS (2021) 38(2 (Elfving et al, 2003;Sugar et al, 2004;Einhorn et al, 2014;Carra et al, 2017;Kaur et al, 2020), and vegetables (Kofidis et al, 2008;Özbay and Ergun, 2015;Başak, 2020), and also to partially downgrade the growth. However, no studies have been made for peach species, and in a study carried out it is observed that no data has been indicated.…”
Section: Vegetative Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%