2016
DOI: 10.1590/1678-4499.275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uso da metodologia REML/BLUP para seleção de genótipos de algodoeiro com maior adaptabilidade e estabilidade produtiva

Abstract: MELHORAMENTO GENÉTICO VEGETAL -ArtigoUso da metodologia REML/BLUP para seleção de genótipos de algodoeiro com maior adaptabilidade e estabilidade produtiva Use of REML/BLUP methodology for selecting cotton genotypes with higher adaptability and productive stability those tested, since they present high adaptability and productive stability of cotton. There was agreement among the statistics used in discrimination of the most productive genotypes with high adaptability and stability, indicating that they can be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
31
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The F test revealed a significant relationship (p < 0.05) between cotton genotypes for all agronomic (Table 1) and technological (Table 2) traits, which allowed for the inference of existing genetic variability between genotypes (Table 1). The coefficient of variation was inferior to 20% of all the evaluated traits, as it was similar to those obtained in published papers studying cotton (Freitas, Leandro, & Carvalho, 2007;Araújo et al, 2013;Jerônimo et al, 2014;Carvalho et al, 2015a, Carvalho, Farias, Morello, Rodrigues, & Teodoro, 2015bCarvalho, Farias, Morello, & Teodoro, 2016a, Carvalho, Farias, Morello, & Teodoro, 2016bQueiroz et al, 2017a;Santos et al, 2017). No significant G x E interaction was observed for the evaluated traits, which indicates similar phenotypic performance for the traits in these three environments.…”
Section: Joint Analysis Of Variancesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The F test revealed a significant relationship (p < 0.05) between cotton genotypes for all agronomic (Table 1) and technological (Table 2) traits, which allowed for the inference of existing genetic variability between genotypes (Table 1). The coefficient of variation was inferior to 20% of all the evaluated traits, as it was similar to those obtained in published papers studying cotton (Freitas, Leandro, & Carvalho, 2007;Araújo et al, 2013;Jerônimo et al, 2014;Carvalho et al, 2015a, Carvalho, Farias, Morello, Rodrigues, & Teodoro, 2015bCarvalho, Farias, Morello, & Teodoro, 2016a, Carvalho, Farias, Morello, & Teodoro, 2016bQueiroz et al, 2017a;Santos et al, 2017). No significant G x E interaction was observed for the evaluated traits, which indicates similar phenotypic performance for the traits in these three environments.…”
Section: Joint Analysis Of Variancesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…produces one of the most important textile fiber of the world, and offers various utility products with great relevance in the Brazilian and the world's economy (Carvalho et al 2015a, Menezes et al 2015, Morello et al 2015. However, changes in spinning technology, competition with synthetic fibers, and the globalization of cotton production and textile products increase the demand for higher quality fiber, making the length of fiber one of the main traits to be improved (Smith et al 2008, Carvalho et al 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on G x E interaction in cotton are scarce in Brazil, and in total, these studies evaluate fiber yield, not the length (Suinaga et al 2006, Souza et al 2006, Silva Filho et al 2008, Farias et al 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genotypic correlation between performance at the locations (rg loc ) was 0.89. This parameter indicates the similarity in the ranking of genotypes at the tested locations (Carvalho et al 2016). The value obtained indicates no complex interaction between genotypes and locations; i.e., there were 89% and 11% simple and complex interactions, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integrated selection (HMRPGV*OM) allows selection considering the HMGV and RPGV*OM methods, i.e., considering the stability, adaptability and productivity means together (Matei et al 2017). Carvalho et al (2016) and Santos et al (2018) reported the efficiency of the HMRPGV method in the simultaneous selection for productivity, stability and adaptability of cotton and bean genotypes, respectively. Thus, selected lines based on this method are essentially productive, are stable in different environments and have the ability to positively respond to environmental stimuli.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%