Soil organic matter fractions affected by N-fertilizer in a green cane management in Brazilian Coastal Tableland

Assunção, Shirlei Almeida; Oliveira, Ana Paula Pessim de; Anjos, Lúcia Helena Cunha dos; Pereira, Marcos Gervásio; Lima, Eduardo

doi:10.1590/1678-4499.2017296

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, management practices have a big influence on soil chemical properties. For instance, nutrients depletion depends on soil types (Satiro et al, 2017;Haynes et al, 2003;Hartemink, 1998b;Hartemink, 1998c;Ali et al, 1986), and it is slower though if good management practices are applied such as irrigation (Van Antwerpen and Meyer, 1996), organic production (Borges et al, 2014), conventional harvesting, green harvesting, trash inoculation or degree of straw removal (Assunção et al, 2018;Liao et al, 2013;Graham and Haynes, 2006;Graham and Haynes, 2005a;Graham et al, 2002;Yadav et al, 1994) and rotational farming (Souza et al, 2012;Stirling et al, 2010;Chorom et al, 2009).…”

Section: Soil Chemical Propertiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

What are the Impacts of Sugarcane Production on Ecosystem Services? A Review

Chami¹,

Daccache²,

Moujabber³

2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since the 1950s sugarcane production has grown rapidly from less than 0.5 billion tonnes in the late 50s to reach over 1.9 billion tonnes in 2012 on about 27 million hectares of agricultural land. This expansion has been boosted by the high demand for bioethanol promoted as a sustainable bioenergy source which accounted in 2010 for the biggest share of the global biofuel market. Despite its benefits, the scientific debate on sugar is growing especially that counterarguments are so many, including negative impacts on different interacting ecosystems and human well-being, e.g. bigger stress on land and water resources, environmental externalities on air, a harmful impact on the biodiversity and endemic species, negative environmental externalities, health, and socio-economic aspects. This paper provides a narrative systematic review (SR) of the impacts of sugarcane production on these different ecosystems employing the ecosystem services framework for its acceptance by policy-makers. The references included for the SR were 163 and results showed that the majority of the studies are from Brazil, Australia, South Africa and the USA (≈ 75% of the literature), most of them were from peer-reviewed journals (85%), and most of the case studies adopted a quantitative research approach (93%). The literature assessed showed that sugarcane, like all agro-systems, depends on the practices and techniques to transform negative impacts into positive externalities on ecosystems and human well-being. However, the literature studied failed to include the inter-linkage in sugarcane production impacts’ and therefore to evaluate the related ecosystem services with respect to the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) framework to account for existing trade-offs. Therefore, the findings are addressed to the scientific community and decision-maker for an intensification of interdisciplinary and integrated research based on the MA framework to cover all ecosystem services, for sustainable development of the sugarcane sector.

show abstract

Section: Soil Chemical Propertiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

What are the Impacts of Sugarcane Production on Ecosystem Services? A Review

Chami¹,

Daccache²,

Moujabber³

2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These sediments discordantly cover not only the crystalline basement rocks, but also the sediments of the meso-cenozoic coastal basins (Demattê et al, 2012). The genesis of this formation seems to be anastomous fluvial, passing to the top, to a meandering fluvial system, and according to the variability of sediments and relief, the soils developed on these materials are associations of Latossolos (Ferralsols), Argissolos (Acrisols) and Espodossolos (Podzols) (Assunção et al, 2018;Andrade et al, 2022).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Soil-Landscape Relationship in a Watershed Located on Pleistocenic Terraces and Fluvio-Lagunarian Sediments in Municipality of Recife, Brazil

Caldas,

Rolim Neto,

Parahyba

et al. 2023

Eng. Agríc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the Prata watershed there are units corresponding to the Pleistocene Terraces and the Fluvium-Lagoon Sediments. This watershed is inserted almost entirely in the area of plateaus (Tabuleiros) with altitudes of 10 to 100 meters, and in areas with altitudes of 2 to 10 meters in the area of floodplains and fluvio-lagoon terraces. The present work aimed to characterize and classify soils in the Brazilian Soil Classification System -SiBCS and correlate them with the IUSS Working Group WRB-FAO (in parentheses), besides evidence some soil-landscape relations, that occur in Pleistocene terraces and fluviumlagoon sediments in the Prata watershed, located in the ecological reserve of Dois Irmãos State Park in Recife -PE, Brazil. Soil samples were used to perform physical, chemical and mineralogical analysis in laboratory. Watershed delimitation, Digital Elevation Model (DEM), slope map, soil map and slope x soil map were obtained and studied. The soils are quite acidic and have a very low natural fertility, with the Latossolos (Ferralsols) predominating in the landscape. The silt and clay fractions of the studied Argissolos (Acrisols) and Latossolos (Ferralsols) presented quartz and kaolinite as the main component. In the profile of Neossolo Quartzarênico (Arenosols) only quartz was identified as a component of the silt and clay fractions. The kaolinitic mineralogy of the clay fraction is consistent with the environment of its formation, that is, hot and humid. There is no relationship between the colors of soils and their exposure to the sun on the slopes where they occur. The occurrence of a sandy and whitish horizon between the litter and the A horizon, is not foreseen in the norms and criteria adopted in the Brazilian Soil Classification System -SiBCS.

show abstract