2017
DOI: 10.1590/1516-3180.2016.0345120617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of a child health surveillance instrument focusing on growth. A cross-sectional study

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Proper use of a child health handbook is an important indicator of the quality of care provided to children at healthcare services. This study aimed to evaluate the use of child health surveillance tool (by health professionals?), especially focusing on growth. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study carried out in the context of the Family Health Strategy in two municipalities in Paraíba, Brazil. METHODS: Three hundred and twenty-one children under five years of age from areas covered by health … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Two were randomised controlled trials [ 21 , 22 ]; three cluster randomised trials [ 23 25 ] and one reporting three year follow-up results of a cluster randomised trial [ 26 ]; eight pre-post studies [ 27 34 ]; 25 cross sectional studies [ 35 59 ]; two qualitative studies [ 60 , 61 ] and one mixed method study [ 62 ]. Sixteen countries; Bangladesh (n = 2) [ 28 , 59 ]; Brazil (n = 10) [ 45 , 49 , 50 , 53 – 57 , 60 , 61 ]; Burkina Faso(n = 1) [ 44 ]; Burundi (n = 1) [ 30 ]; Cambodia (n = 1) [ 31 ]; The Gambia (n = 1) [ 62 ];Indonesia (n = 7) [ 23 , 25 , 34 , 36 , 46 , 47 , 52 ]; Kenya (n = 3) [ 39 , 40 , 48 ]; Lebanon(n = 1) [ 43 ]; Malawi(n = 1) [ 58 ]; Mongolia(n = 3) [ 24 , 26 , 35 ]; Nigeria (n = 1) [ 51 ];Pakistan(n = 2) [ 21 , 22 ]; Palestine(n = 2) [ 29 , 37 ]; South Africa (n = 4) [ 32 , 38 , 41 , ...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two were randomised controlled trials [ 21 , 22 ]; three cluster randomised trials [ 23 25 ] and one reporting three year follow-up results of a cluster randomised trial [ 26 ]; eight pre-post studies [ 27 34 ]; 25 cross sectional studies [ 35 59 ]; two qualitative studies [ 60 , 61 ] and one mixed method study [ 62 ]. Sixteen countries; Bangladesh (n = 2) [ 28 , 59 ]; Brazil (n = 10) [ 45 , 49 , 50 , 53 – 57 , 60 , 61 ]; Burkina Faso(n = 1) [ 44 ]; Burundi (n = 1) [ 30 ]; Cambodia (n = 1) [ 31 ]; The Gambia (n = 1) [ 62 ];Indonesia (n = 7) [ 23 , 25 , 34 , 36 , 46 , 47 , 52 ]; Kenya (n = 3) [ 39 , 40 , 48 ]; Lebanon(n = 1) [ 43 ]; Malawi(n = 1) [ 58 ]; Mongolia(n = 3) [ 24 , 26 , 35 ]; Nigeria (n = 1) [ 51 ];Pakistan(n = 2) [ 21 , 22 ]; Palestine(n = 2) [ 29 , 37 ]; South Africa (n = 4) [ 32 , 38 , 41 , ...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, growth monitoring seemed to concern mothers who received a home-based record. Mothers ignored developmental indicators that they did not understand, such as head circumference [ 72 ] and growth curves (e.g., weight-versus-age chart, BMI-versus-age chart) [ 73 , 75 ]. Further explanation may have supported mothers to address this issue.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Australia and Brazil, growth monitoring was a concern among mothers. Typically, mothers ignored developmental indicators (e.g., head circumference, weight-versus-age chart, BMI-versus-age chart) that they did not understand [ 72 , 73 ]. The findings in this review highlighted the importance of providing adequate written information in the home-based records and an explanation from the healthcare providers to support mothers’ understanding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerando os parâmetros relacionados ao crescimento, ressalta-se nos resultados do atual estudo a subutilização dos gráficos da CSC, coincidindo com relatos anteriores. 2,6,19,20,[24][25][26][27] 4,7,19 Além disso, experiências de outros países tem indicado que práticas adequadas de vigilância do crescimento podem favorecer o estado nutricional das crianças. 10 Deve-se ter presente que o ponto de corte usado para indicar adequação do preenchimento da CSC neste estudo pode ser considerado baixo, o que questiona a possibilidade de assumir os problemas de preenchimento como sinal de pior assistência.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified