2018
DOI: 10.1590/1414-462x201800030028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elaboração e verificação da validade e confiabilidade de um instrumento de letramento em nutrição entre pessoas com diabetes

Abstract: Resumo Introdução o letramento de pessoas com diabetes quanto à nutrição é importante, pois uma alimentação saudável pode melhorar a qualidade de vida dessas pessoas. Objetivo Objetivou-se criar um instrumento denominado Letramento Nutricional entre pessoas com Diabetes (LND) e avaliar a sua validade, confiabilidade e interpretabilidade. Método estudo metodológico com verificação da validade de conteúdo; pré-teste; estimativa da confiabilidade (consistência interna: alfa de Cronbach; reprodutibilidade: k… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some questionnaires were used to measure overall HL and others focusing on the HL related to nutrition, physical activity and medication adherence, using previous developed questionnaires ( Souza et al, 2006 ; Eleutério et al, 2018 ; Martins et al, 2018 ; Cardoso et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some questionnaires were used to measure overall HL and others focusing on the HL related to nutrition, physical activity and medication adherence, using previous developed questionnaires ( Souza et al, 2006 ; Eleutério et al, 2018 ; Martins et al, 2018 ; Cardoso et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation of HL related to nutritional habits was assessed by the Nutritional Literacy among People with Diabetes (NLD) questionnaire whose interpretability is made by identifying and counting the correctness of the associations between 24 trios of words (correct/incorrect/I don't know), with scores from 0 to 24 (cut ≤ 18). Therefore, scores > 18 indicate adequate literacy (75 % of associations are correct) and scores between 0 and 18 indicate inadequate NLD ( Eleutério et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%