2016
DOI: 10.1590/1414-462x201500040125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deforestation and malaria incidence in the legal Amazon Region between 1996 and 2012

Abstract: Malaria is a major public health problem, and Brazil is the largest contributor in America to the number of cases. In the country, the Amazon concentrates around 99.5% of the cases. This article aims to compare trends in deforestation rate and the parasite index of malaria in the Amazon region between 1996 and 2012. The annual crude rate of deforestation and the Annual Parasite Index (API) of malaria between 1996 and 2012 were estimated. The rate of deforestation has great variability among the states every ye… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…vivax . Interestingly, contrary to previous studies [22] [3]and partly as a consequence of the process of occupation of the economic frontier, most of the areas where malaria occurred (formerly areas with forest fringes, industrial mining, illegal mining, agriculture, road construction, deforestation, and açaí and Brazil nut extraction) were concentrated along the Amazon River and in the extractive reserves [39] [22] [40]. This study aimed to integrate evidence-based disease surveillance and control by ranges or zones of territorial occupation of the economic frontier according to economic activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…vivax . Interestingly, contrary to previous studies [22] [3]and partly as a consequence of the process of occupation of the economic frontier, most of the areas where malaria occurred (formerly areas with forest fringes, industrial mining, illegal mining, agriculture, road construction, deforestation, and açaí and Brazil nut extraction) were concentrated along the Amazon River and in the extractive reserves [39] [22] [40]. This study aimed to integrate evidence-based disease surveillance and control by ranges or zones of territorial occupation of the economic frontier according to economic activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Fish farming was heavily subsidised by the government of the state of Acre in 2005, a possible reason for the explosion in malaria cases in this state, particularly in 2006 (Costa et al 2010, Oliveira-Ferreira et al 2010, Duarte et al 2014) and in 2012, when Acre was one of the three states with the highest rates of deforestation and malaria (Guimarães et al 2016). The complex scenario of malaria surveillance on the border between Brazil, Bolivia and Peru deserve special attention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These reductions may be a result of implementation of the intensification plan of malaria control activities in the Brazilian Amazon (PIACM), which was launched in 2000 (MS/SVS 2000). The extent to which vector control measures have been intensified and the improvements in access to timely diagnosis and treatment (Oliveira-Ferreira et al 2010, Griffing et al 2015), as well as the decreasing deforestation rate, may reflect in changes in malaria incidence in the BAR (Guimarães et al 2016). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Brazil, the Amazon region accounts for 99% of malaria cases, and the incidence of malaria in gold mining regions is proportional to deforestation, being present in 39 cities of this biome [72,73]. Although the incidence rates may be even higher (31.3 to 94%), there has been a reduction in recent years in response to control programs implemented by public health services, which can be seen in the gold mining region in Colniza, where there was a seroprevalence of 4.5% [14,15,16,44,74,75].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%