Validity Evidence of the Zulliger-SC Test to children’s assessment

Abstract

Due to the demand for instruments to assess aspects of the personality of children, we aimed find evidence for the validity of the Zulliger test in the Comprehensive System (ZSC). 173 children participated in this study of Fortaleza-CE with ages between 6 years and 11 years and 6 months, 48.5% were from public schools and 53.1% female. The children were divided into three age groups, 6 and 7 years, 8 and 9 years and 10 and 11 years. The instruments used were the Zulliger test and the test of Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices -Special Scale. We made the analysis of descriptive statistics and compared the variables of Zulliger test through the One Way ANOVA test. The significant variables were FQu (p<0.005) and R, m a , D, Xu%, Na, Ls, Fd, (T), GHR and (2) (p<0.05), which contributed with validity evidences of ZSC with children.

Child Sexual Violence: Interpersonal Relationship and Self-Image Evaluated by Zulliger R-Optimized Application

“…Among the projective methods, the Rorschach and Zulliger tests are based on similar assumptions related to psychic processes involved in responses to poorly structured stimuli. by responding to the methods of ink staining, the individual triggers cognitive aspects from the attention, perception, decision making and critical or logical analysis Cardoso, Gomes, & Vieira, 2018;Villemor-Amaral, Pavan, Tavella, Cardoso, & Biasi, 2016).…”

“…The study by Carvalho and Resende (2019) sought to present and compare the performance of 304 children of different ages when answering the Zulliger method. The study by Cardoso et al (2018) aimed to distinguish the performance of children of different ages in a group of 173 children divided into three age groups 6-7, 8-9 and 10-11 years. Biasi and Villemor-Amaral (2016) Another factor motivates the studies of the ZSC in the evaluation of victims of child sexual violence.…”

Comparações entre Meninos e Meninas no Zulliger - Sistema Compreensivo

“…Além disso, também foi localizada uma dissertação que propôs um estudo de normatização para faixa etária dos 7 aos 14 anos (Carvalho, 2015). Um deles foi baseado no Sistema Klopfer (Rodrigues & Alchieri, 2009) e os demais, no Sistema Compreensivo Cardoso, Gomes, & Vieira, 2018;Carvalho & Resende, 2018;Rodrigues & Alchieri, 2009;Tavella & Villemor-Amaral, 2014;Villemor-Amaral, Pavan, Tavella, Cardoso, & Biasi, 2016;Villemor-Amaral & Quirino, 2013;Villemor-Amaral & Vieira, 2016).…”

“…Os estudos apontaram para acurácia do teste em diferenciar grupos de acordo com características específicas, como criatividade (Tavella & Villemor-Amaral, 2014) e traços como sociabilidade . Aliado a isso, o Zulliger mostrou-se adequado para diferenciar grupos etários de acordo com a maturidade relacional, emocional e intelectual (Cardoso, Gomes, & Vieira, 2018;Carvalho, 2015;Villemor-Amaral & Vieira, 2016), indicando as evidências de validade de critério (American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education, 2014).…”

Zulliger R-Optimized Application in Children Victims of Sexual Violence and Cancer

“…Among the instruments available, the Rorschach Method showed validity evidence in assessing sexual violence victims (De Michèle et al, 2019;Scortegagna, Ribeiro, & Villemor-Amaral, 2016;Scortegagna & Villemor-Amaral, 2012 as well as similarities to the Zulliger Method Cardoso, Gomes, & Vieira, 2018). Both tests shared the Comprehensive System (CS), in which inkblot cards are presented to the assessed subjects and they must answer the question "what does this look like?"…”