2022
DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232022274.10142021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avaliação do crescimento fetal de crianças por meio da razão peso/perímetro cefálico

Abstract: Resumo O objetivo deste artigo é utilizar a razão peso/perímetro cefálico ao nascimento para avaliar o crescimento fetal. Estudo transversal aninhado a uma coorte de nascimentos do estado da Paraíba, Nordeste do Brasil, com 726 crianças nascidas a termo e com peso maior ou igual a 2.500 gramas. As medidas antropométricas da criança, características sociodemográficas, cuidados na gestação e tipo de parto foram coletados nas primeiras 24 horas pós-parto. As crianças foram classificadas em proporcionais (peso/per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the sociodemographic characteristics (of the mother or the newborn), only the newborn’s sex, GA, length, and head circumference were associated with the outcome (birth weight and BW/GA ratio). This finding is not consistent with other reports in the literature; for example, cigarette smoking [ 12 ], alcohol consumption [ 1 ], receiving government assistance [ 42 ], and low SES [ 40 ] have been identified elsewhere as determinants of birth weight.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…Of the sociodemographic characteristics (of the mother or the newborn), only the newborn’s sex, GA, length, and head circumference were associated with the outcome (birth weight and BW/GA ratio). This finding is not consistent with other reports in the literature; for example, cigarette smoking [ 12 ], alcohol consumption [ 1 ], receiving government assistance [ 42 ], and low SES [ 40 ] have been identified elsewhere as determinants of birth weight.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%