2021
DOI: 10.1590/1413-812320212611.26722020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporações de medicamentos para doenças raras no Brasil: é possível acesso integral a estes pacientes?

Abstract: Resumo Descrever o perfil de solicitações de incorporação de medicamentos para doenças raras (DR) enviadas à Comissão Nacional de Incorporação de Tecnologias no SUS (CONITEC) e suas recomendações, comparando critérios usados para incorporação com outras agências de avaliações de tecnologias em saúde (ATS) no mundo. Para tanto, foram avaliadas as solicitações submetidas à CONITEC e suas recomendações ao SUS, de julho de 2012 a junho de 2019, para tratamento de DR. A seguir, foi feita comparação dos critérios ut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rst ten years of Conitec's operation featured growth in terms of patient and public involvement as evidenced by the number of public consultations conducted and contributions received over the years; in addition, 13% of recommendations changed after the public consultation, and the signi cant participation of patients and their families was strongly associated with changes in preliminary recommendations regarding the adoption of technologies into the SUS. Previous investigations, which featured shorter follow-up times or analysed speci c subgroups, found the frequency of change in recommendations following a public consultation to 18.8% in the case of medicines up to June 2016 (13), 8% in the case of medicines, products and procedures by 2018 (2) and 19% in the case of rare diseases by June 2019 (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The rst ten years of Conitec's operation featured growth in terms of patient and public involvement as evidenced by the number of public consultations conducted and contributions received over the years; in addition, 13% of recommendations changed after the public consultation, and the signi cant participation of patients and their families was strongly associated with changes in preliminary recommendations regarding the adoption of technologies into the SUS. Previous investigations, which featured shorter follow-up times or analysed speci c subgroups, found the frequency of change in recommendations following a public consultation to 18.8% in the case of medicines up to June 2016 (13), 8% in the case of medicines, products and procedures by 2018 (2) and 19% in the case of rare diseases by June 2019 (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is understood that no matter how much a country invests in health care, it is not possible to incorporate every intervention for the entire populace. Hence, debating more effective ways, in addition to the cost‐effectiveness methodology and the BIA in order to evaluate new technologies is of utmost importance 33 . Standard health technology assessment methods may not fully capture the social value of some health technologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, debating more effective ways, in addition to the costeffectiveness methodology and the BIA in order to evaluate new technologies is of utmost importance. 33 Standard health technology assessment methods may not fully capture the social value of some health technologies. To this end, more research is needed to validate the extent of the deviation between the social value and the efficiency perspective when deciding on reimbursement for health technologies.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%