2018
DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232018234.18082016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caries prevalence among Brazilian indigenous population of urban areas based on the 2010 National Oral Health Survey

Abstract: It is important to have an epidemiological understanding of oral diseases among indigenous persons, in order to contribute with the organization of health services for these populations. The SB Brasil 2010 database was used to compare the prevalence of dental caries among 308 self-identified indigenous and 37,211 non-indigenous individuals from urban areas, in the following age/age-groups: 5, 12, 15-19, 35-44, 65-74. The study also analyzed the effect of the complex sample design and the sample weight in the o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
2
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
15
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Data from the 2010 National Oral Health Survey shows that Brazilian urban Indigenous adults present a mean Decayed, Missing and Filled teeth (DMFT) index of 17.1, similar to the non-indigenous urban population (16.9) 10 . Nevertheless, recent studies conducted with Indigenous adults living in traditional territories demonstrate a rather heterogeneous situation, with DMFT ranging from 13.4 to 20.2 11,12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Data from the 2010 National Oral Health Survey shows that Brazilian urban Indigenous adults present a mean Decayed, Missing and Filled teeth (DMFT) index of 17.1, similar to the non-indigenous urban population (16.9) 10 . Nevertheless, recent studies conducted with Indigenous adults living in traditional territories demonstrate a rather heterogeneous situation, with DMFT ranging from 13.4 to 20.2 11,12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The understanding of the oral health profile of indigenous people is still limited. The few available studies reinforce that in different countries [1][2][3] , this population group faces worse oral health conditions when compared to non-indigenous people.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Another reason for exclusion was variations in measurement of den-tal caries prevalence for both the case and control groups. Therefore, a total of 43 articles [Schamschula et al, 1980;de Muñiz, 1985;del Rio Gomez, 1991;Jones et al, 1992;Rao and Bharambe, 1993;Grim et al, 1994;Davies et al, 1997;Hallett and O'Rourke, 2002;Endean et al, 2004;Schroth et al, 2005;Zeng et al, 2005;Jamieson et al, 2006a, b;Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2007;Jamieson et al, 2007a, b;Brennan et al, 2007;Lawrence et al, 2008;Medina et al, 2008;Gowda et al, 2009;Lawrence et al, 2009;Phelan et al, 2009;Jamieson et al, 2010a, b;Dogar et al, 2011;Foster Page and Murray Thomson, 2011;Page and Thomson, 2011;Singh et al, 2011;Kumar et al, 2013;Kapellas et al, 2014;Drummond et al, 2015;John et al, 2015 2015; Shen et al, 2015;Arrow, 2016;Jamieson et al, 2016a;Schuch et al, 2017;Miranda et al, 2018;Shi et al, 2018;Simangwa et al, 2018;Haag et al, 2020;Arantes et al, 2021] met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review for descriptive analysis. A total of 34 articles were included for meta-analysis...…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%