2017
DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232017222.26392015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validade relativa de questionário de frequência alimentar com suporte de imagens

Abstract: Validade relativa de questionário de frequência alimentar com suporte de imagensRelative validity of a food frequency questionnaire supported by images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(30 reference statements)
2
8
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Data on food intake were obtained using a qualitative reduced version of the food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) validated for adolescents of Rio de Janeiro with photograph support by Brito et al 17 . The reduced version of the FFQ used in the ELANA contained 72 food items, with eight consumption frequency options, ranging from “less than once per month or never” to “four or more times a day”.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on food intake were obtained using a qualitative reduced version of the food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) validated for adolescents of Rio de Janeiro with photograph support by Brito et al 17 . The reduced version of the FFQ used in the ELANA contained 72 food items, with eight consumption frequency options, ranging from “less than once per month or never” to “four or more times a day”.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the SQ-PortFood-FQ estimated higher values of intake, for both energy and nutrients, than the multiple-pass 24-h recall, which had been previously underlined in similar studies, conducted among adolescents [4, 51-53]. Children and adolescents seem to have less ability to recall both the frequency and the amounts of food consumed, because of inherent problems in conceptualizing, recording or estimating portion sizes [6].…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Ainda assim, o QFA superestimou o consumo de nutrientes, resultado compatível com outros estudos (Gigante et al, 2010;Matos et al, 2012;Brito et al, 2017). O mesmo comportamento foi verificado para alguns GA (Voci, Enes & Slater, 2008), sendo necessário corrigir os dados de consumo através dos fatores de calibração (λ) que ratificaram as diferenças entre os métodos uma vez que encontrou-se λ<0,4.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Os resultados são geralmente multiplicados por 100 e expressos em percentual, de modo que 1 (na escala original) ou 100% indicam concordância exata (Ambrosini et al, 2003;Brito et al, 2017). Os LDC95% foram considerados aceitáveis quando ficaram entre 50% e 200% (Ambrosini et al, 2003).…”
Section: Análise Dos Dadosunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation