Community Theater as social support for youth: agents in the promotion of health

Iniquidades sociais e intersetorialidade: desafio à atenção primária à saúde

“…The results showed that, according to the variables, 40% of the studies dealt with intersectorial actions of governmental level involving initiatives of the federal government; 22,24 20% dealt only with local intersectoral actions involving civil society 23 and 40% involved actions of the two types. 25,26 Regarding the theoretical references, 40% involved actions to reduce health inequities based only on the WHO framework, 22.25 , 20%, in the Social Capital benchmark, 23 20% in the WHO reference frameworks and the Course of Life 24 and 20%, in the references of WHO and the Social Capital.…”

“…Regarding the issue of intersectoriality, although the articles show that there is a polysemy on the conceptual basis of intersectoriality, two types can be outlined that have marked a prevalence of the implemented actions: intersectoral action whose initiative, implementation and management departs and remains as government action from the federal level; and another modality that are local intersectoral actions, with initiatives of municipal or even federal governments, but involving participation and civil society organizations and are developed with local territorial base. [22][23][24][25][26] Although governmental intersectoral actions constituted a significant part of the studies (40%), there is a tendency (40% reflect the two types AIG and AIPS) to a concept that defines intersectoral work, emphasizing the interface between governments and civil society, as well as the reciprocity and crosscutting of the sectors towards co-participation and effective sharing of planning and management in the production of intersectoral projects and actions. There is also a tendency to overcome conceptual interpretations that delineate intersectoriality as a multisectoral enterprise through a serial logic, that is, a logic of summation of consecutive efforts without synergy.…”

“…The prevalent idea is that health actions should be included in other sectors. 23 However, some problems are pointed out in relation to the intersectoriality developed at the PHC level 25 . Thus, in the experiences analyzed in several primary care services through the Family Health Strategy in São Paulo, it was verified that the professionals can not decentralize from the biological referent of the health / disease processes, making it difficult for the actions on the SDH, as the most active teams within the clinicalbiological field presented great difficulty in composing and integrating intersectoral projects.…”

Programa saúde na escola: a interface educação/saúde e uso de drogas

“…As narrativas colhidas foram importantes para alertar sobre a importância da elaboração de ações, tendo como base o contexto do aluno e o que ele usa para contribuir com o aprendizado. Freire, (2017) ressalta a valorização do diálogo e a não exclusão (Diba & d'Oliveira, 2015). A matéria-prima de todo o processo de aprendizagem são as pessoasseus saberes, fazeres e quereres -, pois educação é algo que só acontece no plural.…”

Social iniquities in Primary Healthcare and intersectoral action: a descriptive study

“…Some of these actions are: the creation of programs targeted at the inclusion in the work market with a higher income, increased access to health and education services, the creation of programs targeted at the environmental fields, and the fostering of social capital in communities. All that empowers groups, increases social participation from the civil society, improves the gradient in health in the populations studied, improves the state of health of specific groups analyzed, and the ability to confront diseases that are considered poverty-related or that are neglected (6,(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26) .…”