1997
DOI: 10.1590/1413-812319972101922014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Debate sobre o Artigo de Almeida-Filho: "Transdisciplinaridade e Saúde Coletiva"

Abstract: Castiel, 1996).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Noteworthy is the field's theoretical/epistemological reflection conveyed by analyses and debates on transdisciplinarity [67][68][69] . This discussion is central to CH's establishment, considering that the tensions related to the delimitation of its specificity and affirmation as a new social space were part of its history.…”
Section: The Journal and The Construction Of The Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noteworthy is the field's theoretical/epistemological reflection conveyed by analyses and debates on transdisciplinarity [67][68][69] . This discussion is central to CH's establishment, considering that the tensions related to the delimitation of its specificity and affirmation as a new social space were part of its history.…”
Section: The Journal and The Construction Of The Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk is not merely a concept that is relevant in multiple disciplines: we must be increasingly prepared to understand it and build it up as an undisciplined concept. (45) From the argumentative exposition in this text we proceed to identify and evaluate the following ways in which this concept is used: a. Risk: as a potential or hidden danger, by the ordinary social discourse.…”
Section: Perspectives For the Concept Of Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(57) This transit, in turn, is severely hindered by the inflexible and strong boundaries between disciplines, which delimit not only areas of scientific jurisdiction, but also firm interests and powers legitimized by society, which cannot be easily removed without resistance. (45,58) Therefore, significant efforts remain to be made in the political sphere for epidemiology and other disciplines to possibly and effectively engage in intellectual exchange, essentially aimed at the need to overcome the "feudalism" of the sciences and their institutions. For that purpose, there is no better "remover" than the power of solution, that is, the authority and legitimacy derived from the ability to provide convenient and effective answers to problems that hinder the course of everyday life.…”
Section: Conclusion Politicizing the Relations Between Epidemiology D...mentioning
confidence: 99%