2017
DOI: 10.1590/0370-44672016700146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signed distance function implicit geologic modeling

Abstract: Prior to every geostatistical estimation or simulation study there is a need for delimiting the geologic domains of the deposit, which is traditionally done manually by a geomodeler in a laborious, time consuming and subjective process. For this reason, novel techniques referred to as implicit modelling have appeared. These techniques provide algorithms that replace the manual digitization process of the traditional methods by some form of automatic procedure. This paper covers a few well established implicit … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The availability of only short and fragmented series of rainfall measurements, combined with the reduced spatial domains covered by each regional agency, had led to a somewhat limited representativeness of the results used to represent the climatology of extreme events in Italy, as shown, e.g., by [14]. Regional frequency analyses and geostatistical analyses applied to regional-level datasets are also known to lead to artefacts along the regional boundaries (i.e., the borders), when measurements in the nearby "regions" are not included [36,37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The availability of only short and fragmented series of rainfall measurements, combined with the reduced spatial domains covered by each regional agency, had led to a somewhat limited representativeness of the results used to represent the climatology of extreme events in Italy, as shown, e.g., by [14]. Regional frequency analyses and geostatistical analyses applied to regional-level datasets are also known to lead to artefacts along the regional boundaries (i.e., the borders), when measurements in the nearby "regions" are not included [36,37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common method is to regard the mineralization domain where the ore body model is located as a signed implicit function field. The implicit function field represented by Euclidean distance is the classical signed distance field (SDF) 16 , 19 . Among them, the sign of implicit function values represents the internal and external position relationships of the ore body models in the mineralization domain.…”
Section: Overview Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The narrow vein type geological body has the characteristics of thin thickness and layered distribution, which can be regarded as a thin stratified model composed of hanging wall and foot wall surfaces, and its corresponding geological sampling data has obvious sparse and uneven characteristics. As the vein type ore bodies are complex and narrow in one dimension, it is difficult and time consuming to interpolate valid and faithful models by constructing manual interpolation constraints using the traditional interpolation methods 12 16 . Actually, in some cases, the 2.5D vein modeling is analogous to the coal seam modeling 17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unknown coefficients can be obtained by solving a linear system Ãx = f . The common approach of implicit modeling is to convert the drillhole data into the above domain constraints based on a signed distance method [22], as shown in Figure 1. Firstly, the sample segments and non-sample segments of the drillhole data are sampled by a certain sampling interval.…”
Section: Implicit Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%