2020
DOI: 10.1590/01047760202026032737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fitting and Calibrating a Mixed-Effects Segmented Taper Model for Brutian Pine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4). Previous studies showed that a mixedeffects model with random parameters may not be able to fully eliminate the error autocorrelation (Garber & Maguire 2003, Trincado & Burkhart 2006, Ozçelik & Alkan 2020. In this study, the use of the autoregressive error structure AR(1) fully removed the heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation in the residuals.…”
Section: Iforest -Biogeosciences and Forestrymentioning
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…4). Previous studies showed that a mixedeffects model with random parameters may not be able to fully eliminate the error autocorrelation (Garber & Maguire 2003, Trincado & Burkhart 2006, Ozçelik & Alkan 2020. In this study, the use of the autoregressive error structure AR(1) fully removed the heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation in the residuals.…”
Section: Iforest -Biogeosciences and Forestrymentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The parameters of Jiang et al (2005) stem taper model were estimated in this study via AR (1) autoregressive modeling to remove the autocorrelation between the data collected as time series, especially the stem analysis data. The AR (1) autoregressive modeling has been used in many studies and is recommended especially when nonlinear mixed-effects modeling does not completely remove the autocorrelation of errors (Ozçelik & Alkan 2020, Koirala et al 2021.…”
Section: Nonlinear Mixed-effects Modeling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Till today, the proposed taper models included polynomial, sigmoid, principal component analysis (PCA), and linear mixed functions, while contemporary machine learning (ML) approaches being explored (SALEKIN et al, 2021). According to the use of primary data from pine trees, the Max and Burkhart segmented taper equation under the nonlinear mixed-effects modeling technique was extensively used (TRICANDO and BURKHART, 2006;ÖZÇELIK and ALKAN, 2020). NICOLΕTTI et al (2020) evaluated the accuracy of bivariate and generalized linear mixed modeling in the representation of the Pinus taeda L. trunk taper, while many researchers tested parametric and semi-parametric models for constructing reliable taper models (ÖZÇELIK et al, 2016;ALGERA et al, 2019;MARCHI et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%