Development of a managerial tool for prioritization and selection of portfolio projects using the Analytic Hierarchy Process methodology in software companies

Kaiser, Roberto; Futami, André Hideto; Valentina, Luiz Veriano Oliveira Dalla

doi:10.1590/0104-530x4267-19

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“… Click one number per row below using the following scale 1: Necessary 2: Absolutely Necessary 3: Very Necessary 4: Important 5: Absolutely Important 6: Very Important 7: Absolutely Important 8: Extremely Important 9: Extremely Very Important. SCORES Criteria Sub Criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Social Effect [ 11 ] Job creation [ 43 ] Social amenities [ 38 ] Quality of life/Benefits for human life [ 32 , 44 ] Economic developments to communities [ 45 , 46 ] Social Integration [Authors] Eliminate unrest in the areas [Authors] Political impact/alignment/context [ 27 ] Political risk that depends on the policy [ 43 ] Community acceptance [ 47 ] ...…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Using the deterministic approach model for project portfolio selection problem (PPSP) solutions

Mogbojuri,

Olanrewaju

2023

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Using the deterministic approach model for project portfolio selection problem (PPSP) solutions

Mogbojuri,

Olanrewaju

2023

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The AHP method is often used to prioritize software requirements across multiple projects. Several papers discuss case studies on the application of the AHP method, categorized by the number of requirements and divided into small-scale and large-scale scenarios [22].…”

Section: Hybrid Prioritization Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prioritization Model for IT Project Portfolio Management in Private University: A Literature Review

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The swift progress of technology can be harnessed to address the increasing demand for projects, particularly in various organizations like private universities that must cope with resource limitations and make critical decisions. Information Technology (IT) encompasses any technology, such as equipment or techniques, employed by businesses, institutions, or other organizations to process information, including computing, telecommunications technologies, consumer electronics, and broadcasting, as it increasingly digitizes. Choosing between dozens or hundreds of project alternatives presents complex multi-criteria decision-making problems for an organization's portfolio and priorities, necessitating clear-cut techniques, methods, and factor definitions for prioritizing decision-making. This literature review formulates the problem, specifically identifying the criteria for comparison and prioritization models, and seeks a framework and methodology for prioritizing portfolio management in private organizations, particularly universities. The literature review identifies the characteristics of private organizations and the methodologies and practices employed in researching the application of portfolio management priorities and explores the use of portfolio management techniques from prior studies tested in practice and project priority methodologies in private services. The results contribute to enhancing theories on techniques, methods, and, particularly, portfolio project management priorities for the private sector.

show abstract

“…Since its inception, AHP has become widely applied because of its simplicity and ease of deployment. It has been transformed into a popular tool for prioritization and selection of portfolios of projects [2] . The main objective of its application is to construct a ranking of alternatives by decomposing the problem under analysis into a hierarchy of criteria, sub-criteria, and alternatives [3] .…”

Section: Methods Detailsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multimethod to prioritize projects evaluated in different formats

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The prioritization of Research, Development & Innovation Projects is an essential step in the innovation management process. As a rule, it is carried out applying methods that allow one to process experts' preferences concerning each project according to established criteria. However, there are different preference formats which experts can utilize: Ordering of Alternatives, Utility Values, Multiplicative Preference Relations, Fuzzy Estimates, Fuzzy Preference Relations, etc. Wherein, each prioritization method usually handles only one of these formats. Thus, the following question arises: how do we prioritize projects taken from portfolios evaluated in different formats? The proposed methodology presents a way to overcome this gap by achieving three main objectives. First, develop techniques that make it possible to crossover between preference formats and prioritization methods. Second, merge two portfolios of projects built applying different prioritization methods. Third, prioritize projects evaluated using different formats. The results of this study are universal and can be applied to replace any method of prioritization. In the specific case, the Mapping method is replaced by the Analytic Hierarchy Process and, then, by the Interactive Multicriteria Decision Making method (so called TODIM method). Techniques are also proposed to ensure compatibility between different preference formats and prioritization methods. Prioritization of projects evaluated in different formats using the Mapping, AHP, and TODIM methods. Providing fully consistent evaluation matrices. Application of techniques to make different preference formats and prioritization methods compatible.

show abstract

Development of a managerial tool for prioritization and selection of portfolio projects using the Analytic Hierarchy Process methodology in software companies

Cited by 4 publications

References 33 publications

Using the deterministic approach model for project portfolio selection problem (PPSP) solutions

Using the deterministic approach model for project portfolio selection problem (PPSP) solutions

Prioritization Model for IT Project Portfolio Management in Private University: A Literature Review

Multimethod to prioritize projects evaluated in different formats

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About