2020
DOI: 10.1590/0103-8478cr20190461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Livelihood capitals on income inequality among rural households: evidence from China

Abstract: We used the data of the China Labor-force Dynamics Survey 2014 to examine the effects of livelihood capitals which include natural, material, human, financial, and social capitals on total household income, per capita income, agricultural income, wage income, operational income, and property income inequality among rural households in China. Results showed that different kinds of livelihood capitals have different effects on different types of rural households’ income. Specifically; (1) although, the area of c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results have an expected priori and an increase in livestock production provides income that minimizes the gap between the rich and poor. Same results were obtained by Yang et al (2020) and Carr et al (2016).…”
Section: Long-run Analysissupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The results have an expected priori and an increase in livestock production provides income that minimizes the gap between the rich and poor. Same results were obtained by Yang et al (2020) and Carr et al (2016).…”
Section: Long-run Analysissupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The Internet has the advantage of low learning and training costs, and the use of digital technology and the acquisition of digital skills helps to broaden the non-agricultural employment options of the rural workforce and enhances job matching, increasing their employment and formal employment rates and strengthening employment stability (49)(50)(51). Thirdly, Internet use can facilitate asset factor allocation and increase property income (52,53). Internet use has increased the scale of financial assets of farm households, helping to improve the asset allocation structure and promoting higher property income for farm households (53)(54)(55).…”
Section: Theoretical Analysis and Research Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…“The indicator of “urban‐rural integration” is based on the research paradigm of Chen and Long (2019), which adopts the ratio of per capita income and expenditure difference to income of residents who have switched from agriculture to non‐agriculture and urban residents to portray urban‐rural development potential. The five variables of “log of gift expenses, log of communication expenses, log of transportation expenses, log of travel expenses, and log of entertainment expenses” were selected in the measurement of social capital quality indicators (Yang et al, 2020). Then, the same variables of CHFS 2017 were innovatively introduced, and the overall expenditure intervals of the two periods were adopted to divide the expenditure into five intervals (assigned values 1 to 5) in numerical order.…”
Section: Analysis Of Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Property income, as a stable and durable source of income base (Angelovska & Časni, 2022), can effectively improve the income and wealth gap through productivity gap reduction (Brian & Jessica, 2013; Yao & Li, 2021), income source switching (Yu & Wang, 2021), and others (Yao et al., 2022). However, most of the existing studies cut from the perspectives of municipal incorporation (Hodges & Stephens, 2021), collective operating construction land transactions (Jiao & Xu, 2022) and livelihood capital (Yang et al, 2020) while neglecting the impact related to the citizenship of the agricultural transfer population (CRM) on property income in the urbanization construction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%