2020
DOI: 10.1590/0103-6513.20190155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What are the key determinants of maintenance performance?

Abstract: Paper aims: The main objective of the research is to present a combination of fuzzy decision-making techniques to measure the performance of preventive maintenance systems. Originality: This research is a timely response to studying the prominent role of preventive maintenance performance in reducing cost, profitability, and overall organization's output. Research method: This study considers the application of "fuzzy DEMATEL" and ANP techniques for measuring maintenance performance and determining the causal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reviewed papers provide a big picture of MPM, for instance, its definition and boundaries (Parida and Kumar, 2009;Kumar et al, 2013), challenges and issues (Parida and Kumar, 2006), development of maintenance performance indicators (MPI) and maintenance performance frameworks (Parida et al, 2015). In addition, several questionnaires have been designed to identify the most utilized indicators in their respective fields (Muchiri et al, 2010;Simões et al, 2011;Ku and Kim, 2019;Darestani et al, 2020).…”
Section: Maintenance Performance Measurement (Mpm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reviewed papers provide a big picture of MPM, for instance, its definition and boundaries (Parida and Kumar, 2009;Kumar et al, 2013), challenges and issues (Parida and Kumar, 2006), development of maintenance performance indicators (MPI) and maintenance performance frameworks (Parida et al, 2015). In addition, several questionnaires have been designed to identify the most utilized indicators in their respective fields (Muchiri et al, 2010;Simões et al, 2011;Ku and Kim, 2019;Darestani et al, 2020).…”
Section: Maintenance Performance Measurement (Mpm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research agenda have also proved human factors value in Industry 4.0 maintenance programs. Darestani et al (2020) applied fuzzy DEMATEL and ANP techniques for measuring performance factors and concluded employee satisfaction, growth and learning, availability of machinery and equipment, quality of maintenance by the skilled and highly-trained workforce were found the most important factors for a competitive predictive maintenance performance. Guedes et al (2021) have complementarily investigated the role of teamwork motivation and human factors influence on production lines in a Total Productive Maintenance implementation project and brought consistent evidence of work motivation positive influence on project performance.…”
Section: Team Performance Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%