2015
DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201300161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional Digital Evaluation of Dental Arches in Infants with Cleft Lip and/or Palate

Abstract: The aim of this study was to measure and compare the dimensions of the dental arches on three-dimensional digital study models in children with and without cleft lip and palate before the primary surgery. The sample consisted of 223 digital models of children aged 3-9 months, divided into 5 groups: without craniofacial deformities, unilateral and bilateral incomplete cleft lip and alveolus, unilateral and bilateral complete cleft lip and alveolus, unilateral cleft lip and palate, and bilateral cleft lip and pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
1
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(21 reference statements)
2
27
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical Implications Uzel and Alparslan (2011) reported that the AW of the cleft group was originally higher than that of the noncleft group and this difference would remain until the lip and palate surgery took place. In the current RCT, the slight reduction of the AW may not be of a high clinical significance, since by the end of the AM, the mean was 28.96 mm (Appendix Table 1), making it higher than any of the published norms (Kramer et al 1994;Fernandes et al 2015). Similarly, by the end of AM, the mean PW was 37.23 mm, which is also higher than any of the published norms (Huddart et al 1979;Kramer et al 1994;Mello et al 2013;Fernandes et al 2015).…”
Section: Effect Of Minimizing Cleft Gap On 3d Progressive Maxillary Gcontrasting
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clinical Implications Uzel and Alparslan (2011) reported that the AW of the cleft group was originally higher than that of the noncleft group and this difference would remain until the lip and palate surgery took place. In the current RCT, the slight reduction of the AW may not be of a high clinical significance, since by the end of the AM, the mean was 28.96 mm (Appendix Table 1), making it higher than any of the published norms (Kramer et al 1994;Fernandes et al 2015). Similarly, by the end of AM, the mean PW was 37.23 mm, which is also higher than any of the published norms (Huddart et al 1979;Kramer et al 1994;Mello et al 2013;Fernandes et al 2015).…”
Section: Effect Of Minimizing Cleft Gap On 3d Progressive Maxillary Gcontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…In the current RCT, the slight reduction of the AW may not be of a high clinical significance, since by the end of the AM, the mean was 28.96 mm (Appendix Table 1), making it higher than any of the published norms (Kramer et al 1994;Fernandes et al 2015). Similarly, by the end of AM, the mean PW was 37.23 mm, which is also higher than any of the published norms (Huddart et al 1979;Kramer et al 1994;Mello et al 2013;Fernandes et al 2015). Consequently, the quantitative analysis performed in the current RCT clearly proves that throughout the period of therapy, the AM procedures have no adverse effect on the TV maxillary dimensions.…”
Section: Effect Of Minimizing Cleft Gap On 3d Progressive Maxillary Gmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Fernandes et al [20], compared the dental arch dimensions on 3D digital study models in patients with and without CLP before the primary surgery. They examined the 223 digital models of patients aged between 3 -9 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For evaluation of treatment results plaster casts with use of calipers are still used, but digital three-dimensional (3D) casts are getting more accepted. Digital casts have several advantages over traditional casts in terms of availability (copies can be sent easily), storage (no need for physical storage) and safety (no breakage, and digital backups can easily be made) ( Fleming, Marinho & Johal, 2011 ; Fernandes et al, 2015 ; Camardella et al, 2020 ). Although multiple studies have reported a small decrease of repeatability for linear measurements as compared to plaster models ( Abizadeh et al, 2012 ; De Waard et al, 2014 ), digital models can be used for more complex applications like 3D area/volume calculations, superimposition with other models, digital manipulation and use of digital algorithms ( Fleming, Marinho & Johal, 2011 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%