2019
DOI: 10.1590/0102-33062018abb0339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Legacies of intensive management in forests around pre-columbian and modern settlements in the Madeira-Tapajós interfluve, Amazonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The predominant idea among archaeologists regarding ecological legacies is that useful species were deliberately enriched or depleted in the pre-Columbian era, and that those altered abundances have persisted until the modern era (Ferreira et al, 2019;Levis et al, 2012Levis et al, , 2017; Figure 1). Under this scenario, useful or domesticated species in the Lake Kumpak a sediment record should have flourished during the peak of maize cultivation and show persistently elevated abundances even after the cessation of cultivation (direct and persistent enrichment; Figure 1a).…”
Section: Ecological Legaciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The predominant idea among archaeologists regarding ecological legacies is that useful species were deliberately enriched or depleted in the pre-Columbian era, and that those altered abundances have persisted until the modern era (Ferreira et al, 2019;Levis et al, 2012Levis et al, , 2017; Figure 1). Under this scenario, useful or domesticated species in the Lake Kumpak a sediment record should have flourished during the peak of maize cultivation and show persistently elevated abundances even after the cessation of cultivation (direct and persistent enrichment; Figure 1a).…”
Section: Ecological Legaciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerable disagreement exists regarding the scale of these transformations both in space and time (Bush et al., 2015; Clement et al., 2015; Ferreira, Levis, Iriarte, & Clement, 2019; Levis et al., 2017; Maezumi et al., 2018; McMichael & Bush, 2019; McMichael, Feeley, Dick, Piperno, & Bush, 2017; Piperno, McMichael, & Bush, 2019; Stahl, 2015). But regardless of the spatial and temporal scale of these modifications, the arrival of Europeans brought enslavement, maltreatment and novel diseases to a susceptible population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, using indices from satellite imagery, (Palace et al 2017) found that biomass, tree height and tree cover are lower in forests located on ADE than random forest sites within 50 km of ADE. Since we worked no more than 4 km from ADE (see also (Ferreira et al 2019), we found small-scale differences in forest structure that may be difficult to detect using only satellite data. The forest on top of ADE had an extremely high value of stand basal area (48 m 2 /ha) compared to our other study plots (Table S4) and other plots elsewhere across Amazonia (Baker et al 2004), driven mainly by two individuals of sumaúma (Ceiba pentandra), which is an indicator of ADE (Clement et al 2003).…”
Section: Effects Of Pre-columbian and Current Landscape Domesticationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signs of landscape domestication can also be detected by assessing the distribution and abundance of useful, managed and/or domesticated species (Clement and Cassino 2018), as observed in Central Amazonia (Levis et al 2012;Ferreira et al 2019), Western Amazonia (Franco- Moraes et al 2019) and across the Amazon basin (Levis et al 2017). At least 85 arboreal species, mostly used for food, have populations domesticated to some degree by pre-Columbian peoples in Amazonia (Levis et al 2017), and they are concentrated in and around settlements due to numerous historical management practices (Levis et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other settings, where pre-Columbian people practiced slash-and-burn agriculture or set fires to improve hunting, there can be long histories of land use through burning (Bush et al, 2008;Maezumi et al, 2018). Considerable discussion surrounds the spatial scale of such forest modification with some arguing for all of Amazonian forest being heavily modified by human actions (Clement et al, 2015;Ferreira et al, 2019). Another view is that many rivers and lakes were prime occupational settings and were modified by crop cultivation, timber removal, and enrichment with palms .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%