2022
DOI: 10.1590/0102-311xen199121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perception of discrimination due to sexual orientation and associated factors among men who have sex with men in 12 Brazilian cities

Abstract: Discrimination due to sexual orientation (DDSO) has an important association with health outcomes among men who have sex with men (MSM). This study aimed to analyze factors associated with DDSO among MSM in 12 Brazilian cities. This is a cross-sectional study with 4,176 MSM participants recruited in 2016 which used a respondent-driven sampling method in 12 Brazilian cities. DDSO levels were previously identified by a latent class analysis based on 13 variables from the discrimination section. An ordinal logist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Brazil, a multicity population-based survey of MSM conducted in 2016, found that 65% of the respondents had been discriminated against because of their sexual orientation [25] . Interestingly, a prior survey, conducted in 2009 [26] , with a similar rationale to that of the 2016 study, had reported a much lower frequency of discrimination based on sexual orientation (28%), pointing to an increase in societal conservatism in most recent years, coupled with increased awareness of what constitutes discriminatory acts [27] . Fear of disclosure of sexual orientation delays access to care [28] as suggested in a previous study with PLWH in Brazil that showed cisgender men with unknown sexual orientation had 2.5 times the odds for late presentation relative to MSM [16] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In Brazil, a multicity population-based survey of MSM conducted in 2016, found that 65% of the respondents had been discriminated against because of their sexual orientation [25] . Interestingly, a prior survey, conducted in 2009 [26] , with a similar rationale to that of the 2016 study, had reported a much lower frequency of discrimination based on sexual orientation (28%), pointing to an increase in societal conservatism in most recent years, coupled with increased awareness of what constitutes discriminatory acts [27] . Fear of disclosure of sexual orientation delays access to care [28] as suggested in a previous study with PLWH in Brazil that showed cisgender men with unknown sexual orientation had 2.5 times the odds for late presentation relative to MSM [16] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Moreover, our sample might overrepresent individuals with higher socioeconomic status, given that access to an electronic device compatible with geosocial network apps and an internet data plan was necessary for study participation. Indeed, if we compare our sample to that reached in the 12-cities respondent-driven-sampling study conducted in 2016 46 we note that our sample was much older (only 9.5% aged <25 years compared to 56.1% in 46 ) and with higher educational level (73.8% reported post-secondary education compared to 29.7% in 46 ). Also, the racial composition of our sample (25.7% Pardo , 12.1% Black) was also much different from the 2016 study 46 (41.8% Pardo, 22.7% Black).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Indeed, if we compare our sample to that reached in the 12-cities respondent-driven-sampling study conducted in 2016 46 we note that our sample was much older (only 9.5% aged <25 years compared to 56.1% in 46 ) and with higher educational level (73.8% reported post-secondary education compared to 29.7% in 46 ). Also, the racial composition of our sample (25.7% Pardo , 12.1% Black) was also much different from the 2016 study 46 (41.8% Pardo, 22.7% Black).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…A discriminação decorrente da orientação sexual apresenta uma tendência crescente e cada vez mais pulverizada e depende da liderança política e moral ou da falta dela (MAGNO et al, 2021a). Portanto, é preciso responder as lacunas existentes no conhecimento programático sobre o estigma e as categorias de risco vulneráveis, requisitando a incorporação de diferentes abordagens de estigma com apoios psicológicos e sociais em resposta ao HIV (BABEL et al, 2021).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified