2019
DOI: 10.1590/0102-311x00209418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobilidade urbana ativa de adultos com perda auditiva e a percepção sobre o ambiente: um estudo multicêntrico

Abstract: Resumo: O objetivo deste estudo foi estimar a associação entre perda auditiva e mobilidade urbana ativa (a pé e/ou de bicicleta), segundo a percepção sobre o ambiente em adultos de três capitais brasileiras. Trata-se de um estudo transversal com 2.350 adultos (18-59 anos) residentes das cidades de Brasília (Distrito Federal), Florianópolis (Santa Catarina) e Porto Alegre (Rio Grande do Sul), avaliados pelo estudo multicêntrico Mobilidade Urbana Saudável (MUS), em 2017 e 2018. A variável de desfecho foi a mobil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The methodology used is another highlight of the research because population surveys are an important tool for collecting epidemiological data, which may support more effective health care actions. Regarding study limitations, it is noteworthy that pure tone audiometry was not performed to confirm hearing loss although selfreported data on hearing loss have been widely used in population studies 19,40,41 . Furthermore, there is the possible reverse causality bias inherent to cross-sectional studies, as the longitudinal analysis was impossible due to data collection on participants' hearing were conducted only in 2017/2019.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodology used is another highlight of the research because population surveys are an important tool for collecting epidemiological data, which may support more effective health care actions. Regarding study limitations, it is noteworthy that pure tone audiometry was not performed to confirm hearing loss although selfreported data on hearing loss have been widely used in population studies 19,40,41 . Furthermore, there is the possible reverse causality bias inherent to cross-sectional studies, as the longitudinal analysis was impossible due to data collection on participants' hearing were conducted only in 2017/2019.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main exposure variable was adjusted for all study variables, regardless of the p-value. The variables were simultaneously included in the adjusted analysis, following the statistical method of a previous study [13]. Statistically significant associations were admitted only when their odds of occurrence were equal to or lower than 0.05 (i.e., p ≤ 5%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%