Neopythagoreanism in the work of Johannes Kepler

Abstract

In this article I argue that the methodology in the Johannes Kepler´s work is guided by two principles of Pythagorean nature, they are: (i) sameness is made known by sameness, and (ii) harmony arises from establishing a limit to what is unlimited. By way of hypothesis, I present a general outline, which includes those principles, and I indicate how they are present in Kepler's investigations. I examine two particular cases in the light of that schema. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________The importance given to geometry, regular solid fixation, obsession with harmony and the fact to consider that music and astronomy as sister sciences are just some features of the Pythagorean influence protruding on the surface of the work of Johannes Kepler. However, the presence of Pythagoras in the work of this scientist and philosopher of the 17th century can be traced more deeply on the methodological aspects.1 I am grateful to the Fund of research of the Universidad del Rosario (DVG-146) for the support given to the development of this research. I am also grateful for the contributions of Juliana Gutiérrez.

Untitled

“…Candidate of Philological Sciences, Senior Lecturer, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (Kyiv, Ukraine) E-mail: mariia.lastovets@knu.ua https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4535-4518 Rudenko, Sergii and Mariia Lastovets (2023) Cosmological Ideas of Johannes Kepler in Their Relation to Antiquity Based on the Treatise Harmonices Mundi. Philosophy and Cosmology,Volume 31,[108][109][110][111][112][113][114][115] https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/31/9…”

“…The methodology of the present paper is based on a number of approaches to the study of Kepler's intellectual heritage: a) philosophical, represented by G. Claessens (2011), C.A. Cardona (2016, J.…”