Rootstock-Scion Interaction: 1. Effect on the Yield Components of Cabernet Sauvignon Grapevine

Miele, Alberto; Rizzon, Luiz Antenor

doi:10.1590/0100-29452017820

Cited by 17 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The presence or absence of fungi, insects and nematodes was not evaluated. Data related to the vineyard, such as soil preparation, planting, trellising, spaces between rows and plants, pruning and training grapevines, canopy management and control of diseases, pests and weeds were described in previous paper RIZZON, 2017).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Grafting vines is one of the cultural practices that can influence yield components (MIELE; RIZZON, 2017), and consequently have effect on grape composition (MIELE et al, 2009a;LEÃO et al, 2011;JOGAIAH et al, 2013;CHOU;LI, 2014;GONG et al, 2014;SOUZA et al, 2015). If rootstocks can affect the grapevine yield components and the grape composition, they can also influence the wine composition.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Rootstock-scion interaction:3. Effect on the composition of Cabernet Sauvignon wine

Miele

Rizzon

2019

Rev. Bras. Frutic.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The interaction among rootstock, scion and environment may induce different responses to the grapevine physiology and consequently to the grape and wine composition. The vineyards of Serra Gaúcha, Brazil, are established in soils that may have different physicochemical attributes. Furthermore, the grapevines are grafted on a wide diversity of rootstocks. Therefore, this study aimed to determine their effect on the wine composition of the Cabernet Sauvignon (CS) grafted on Rupestris du Lot, 101-14 Mgt, 3309 C, 420A Mgt, 5BB K, 161-49 C, SO4, Solferino, 1103 P, 99 R, 110 R, Gravesac, Fercal, Dogridge and Isabel, featuring some genetic diversity altogether. The experimental design was in randomized blocks, with 15 treatments, three replicates and 10 vines per plot. The grapes were harvested at maturity for three years, and then wines were made in glass recipients of 20 L. When alcoholic and malolactic fermentations were over, the wine analyses were performed on twenty-five variables related to alcohol, acidity, dry extract, polyphenols and volatile compounds. The main results show that all variables were affected year by year, some of them by the rootstock and a few by the interaction between rootstock and year. The rootstock effect was observed mainly on variables related to alcohol, acidity and ashes. Results show that the CS/101-14 Mgt wine had higher alcohol content than CS/Dogridge and CS/Isabel wines, which was probably due to the 101-14 Mgt rootstock favoring an early grape ripening. However, higher pH values were observed in the CS/Rupestris du Lot, CS/5BB K and CS/Gravesac than CS/420A Mgt, CS/110 R and CS/Isabel wines. These results show that there is a diversity of rootstocks that can be used by the growers due to the Cabernet Sauvignon wine composition similarities.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rootstock-scion interaction:3. Effect on the composition of Cabernet Sauvignon wine

Miele

Rizzon

2019

Rev. Bras. Frutic.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The vineyard consisted of 450 plants, 30 of each Cabernet Sauvignon/rootstock (CS/rootstock), distributed in three blocks. Data related to vineyard management were previously shown (MIELE; RIZZON, 2017). Pruning was performed on September 3 rt , 1998 and September 2 nd , 1999, in the vine's dormant period.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rootstock-scion interaction:6. Phenology, chilling and heat requirements of Cabernet Sauvignon grapevine

Miele

2019

Rev. Bras. Frutic.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The grapevine phenology is dependent on several factors, such as genetics, soil characteristics, climate conditions, pests and diseases and vineyard cultural practices. Among these, grafting may have an effect on the scion behavior due to the influence of the rootstock. Therefore, an experiment was carried out for two years to determine the effect of rootstocks on Cabernet Sauvignon (CS) grapevine phenology, chilling and heat requirements. Treatments consisted of vines grafted on the rootstocks Rupestris du Lot, 101-14 Mgt, 3309 C, 420A Mgt, 5BB K, 161-49 C, SO4, Solferino, 1103 P, 99 R, 110 R, Gravesac, Fercal, Dogridge and Isabel. Budbreak and flowering of the vines, veraison and maturity of the grapes were the phenological stages evaluated, determining the dates of each stage and the number of days between them. The chilling hours (Tbase= 10 °C) for budbreak and the heat summation required to ripen the grapes were also determined. The results showed that the dates of each phenological stage varied according to the year and the rootstock. The average of two years showed that CS/3309 C, CS/161-49 C and CS/101-14 Mgt sprouted earlier and CS/Dogridge later. Grape maturity was earlier on seven CS/rootstocks, where CS/101-14 Mgt and CS/Rupestris du Lot ripened first and CS/Isabel, CS/5BB K and CS/SO4 later. The average intervals between the stages of CS/rootstocks were (in days), 46.8±3.0 (budbreak-flowering), 64.3±2.1 (flowering-veraison), 54.6±6.1 (veraison-maturity) and 165.7±7.4 (budbreak-maturity). In 1998, 615.9±8.0 chill hours were needed to achieve 50% budbreak and in 1999, 870.6±6.5 chill hours, where CS/Dogridge required the highest chilling to break dormancy. In order to ripen the grapes, the heat requirement from budbreak to maturity was 1573.4±43.0 °C in 1998/1999 and 1599.4±25.5 °C in 1999/2000, and the juice total soluble solids values were 19.1 and 18.1 °Brix, respectively. Although the heat summation of the second cycle was 1.65% higher, the total soluble solids were lower due to the rainfall that was much higher during its grape ripening period.

show abstract

“…The rootstock and training system affect the development of the root and the vegetative canopy of the grapevine, influencing photosynthesis and carbon assimilation (Bascunán-Godoy et al, 2017). Numerous studies carried out in different Brazilian wine regions have demonstrated the influence of the rootstock on phenology, vigor, yield and grape quality (Orlando et al, 2008;Mota et al, 2009;Dias et al, 2012;Tecchio et al, 2013;Souza et al, 2015;Miele and Rizzon, 2017). The response of the grapevine to the rootstock is specific and depends on the combination between canopy and rootstock cultivars, as well as its interaction with the edaphoclimatic conditions of each region (Vrsic et al, 2015).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Agronomic responses of grapevine ‘Chenin Blanc’ as a function of training systems and rootstocks

Leão

Chaves

2021

Sci. agric. (Piracicaba, Braz.)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this research was to study the influence of training system and rootstock on the yield, vigor and physiology of the 'Chenin Blanc' grapevine at São Francisco Valley, northeastern Brazil. An experiment was carried out on eight harvests, from 2013 to 2017, in Petrolina, in the state of Pernambuco. Grapevines were grown under two training systems, lyre and espalier, and five rootstocks: 'IAC 572', 'IAC 313', 'IAC 766', 'Paulsen 1103' and 'SO4', using a split-plot randomized block design, with training systems assigned to the main plot and the rootstock assigned to the subplot. Lyre favored an increase in the number of bunches, branches and leaf mass in the harvest of the first semester of the year, while in the second semester there were increases of 40 % in the number of bunches and 10 % in leaf mass. Lyre promoted more balanced vines, showing a better ratio between production and pruning weight (Ravaz index). The rootstocks 'IAC 766', 'IAC 313' and 'IAC 572' increased yield and bunch mass under both training systems, while 'SO4' reduced yield and vigor. The stomatal conductance and instantaneous efficiency of water use were not influenced by either the training system or the rootstock. Under tropical conditions in the São Francisco Valley, 'Chenin Blanc' grapevine may be grown under the lyre training system, preferably on the 'IAC 766' rootstock, to obtain high yields and balanced grapevines.

show abstract

Rootstock-Scion Interaction: 1. Effect on the Yield Components of Cabernet Sauvignon Grapevine

Cited by 17 publications

References 20 publications

Rootstock-scion interaction:3. Effect on the composition of Cabernet Sauvignon wine

Rootstock-scion interaction:3. Effect on the composition of Cabernet Sauvignon wine

Rootstock-scion interaction:6. Phenology, chilling and heat requirements of Cabernet Sauvignon grapevine

Agronomic responses of grapevine ‘Chenin Blanc’ as a function of training systems and rootstocks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About