2016
DOI: 10.1590/0100-29452016533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plot Size in the Evaluation of Papaya Seedlings 'Baixinho De Santa Amália' in Tubes

Abstract: ABSTRACT-Were evaluated three characters in papaya seedlings 'Baixinho de Santa Amália' to estimate the optimum plot size and the number of replications in a completely randomized experiment, a randomized block and Latin square. The characters were seedling height, leaf number and length of roots from uniformity test with 240 seedlings. The determination of the optimum plot size was done by applying the method of Hatheway (1961). The number of seedlings per plot for seedling production is variable depending on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems reasonable for the researcher to assume a value of d = 30% because any further increase in the accuracy will result in a large increase in plot size. Similar results were observed by other researchers using Hatheway's method (Muniz et al, 2009;Celanti et al, 2016b (Table 4). Therefore, for the same precision, smaller plots and larger number of replications are more efficient for the use of the same experimental area, as observed by Muniz et al (2009) in eucalyptus andSouza et al (2015) in sunflower.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It seems reasonable for the researcher to assume a value of d = 30% because any further increase in the accuracy will result in a large increase in plot size. Similar results were observed by other researchers using Hatheway's method (Muniz et al, 2009;Celanti et al, 2016b (Table 4). Therefore, for the same precision, smaller plots and larger number of replications are more efficient for the use of the same experimental area, as observed by Muniz et al (2009) in eucalyptus andSouza et al (2015) in sunflower.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As reported by Cargnelutti , the parameter d measures the precision, being that a small percentage of d indicates greater precision; in other words, small differences between treatments means will be considered significant. In the simulations, the criteria for combinations take into consideration d values as 20, 30 and 40% and the other criteria were used according to Celanti et al (2016b): the lowest number of treatments was three (I = 3), whereas the detection of the difference between two means can now be made by analysis of variance; the smallest number of replications was 2 (J = 2), because this is the minimum for detecting the experimental error; the I treatments and J replications were combined to provide a minimum of 20 plots per experiment, according to Pimentel-Gomes (2009) recommendations; since this is a discrete random variable, the optimum plot size was presented by integer number, rounding to the closest whole number.…”
Section: Source Of Variation Degrees Of Freedom Mean Square (Ms) Expementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain the adequate plot size, are described in literature dozens of methodologies, and among these are distinguished by their frequent use, currently, the maximum modified curvature, according to Meier and Lessman (1970), that of the maximum curvature of the varient's coefficient (Paranaíba, Ferreira, & Morais, 2009), and, that of Hatheway (1961). According to Celanti, Schmildt, Alexandre, Cattaneo, and Schmildt (2016b), the use of Hatheway's methodology is interesting because it can satisfy the yearnings of the researcher who wishes to know the adequate plot size for their research accuracy, that includes the number of treatments and replications, the experimental outline used and the experiments precision. Among recent uses of Hatheway's methodology are mentioned those of Cargnelutti in determining the plot size in experiments with Pigeon pea and that of Schmildt et al (2018) with papaya tree genotypes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the optimum size (X 0 ) ranged from 4 plants per plot for aerial part height and stalk diameter to 10 plants per plot for root dry matter (Table 2). Different plot size for different characteristics were also detected to determine the optimum plot size in experiments with others researchers in others cultures (Cipriano et al, 2012;Firmino et al, 2012;Celanti et al, 2016aCelanti et al, , 2016b. Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Researches to determine optimum plot size has been done for coffee seedlings 'Rubi' (Cipriano, Cogo, Campos, & Almeida, 2012), coffee seedlings 'Catuaí Amarelo 2SL' (Firmino et al, 2012), papaya 'Golden PC' (Celanti et al, 2016a) and papaya 'Baixinho de Santa Amália' (Celanti, Schmildt, Alexandre, Cattaneo, & Schmildt, 2016b). For okra, however, no work was found in the literature about determining the optimum plot size in seedling production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%