2016
DOI: 10.1590/0100-2945-258/14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterotic Group Formation in Psidium Guajava L. By Artificial Neural Network and Discriminant Analysis

Abstract: abstract-the present study aimed at evaluating the heterotic group formation in guava based on quantitative descriptors and using artificial neural network (ANN). For such, we evaluated eight quantitative descriptors. Large genetic variability was found for the eight quantitative traits in the 138 genotypes of guava. The artificial neural network technique determined that the optimal number of groups was three. The grouping consistency was determined by linear discriminant analysis, which obtained classificati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The State University of Northern Rio de Janeiro (UENF) has been developing a guava (P. guajava L.) breeding program for approximately nine years, generating promising results regarding the composition of several types of study populations (Pessanha et al, 2011;Campos et al, 2013;Oliveira et al, 2013;Campos et al, 2016). In these studies, the production of inbred families was determined as the possibility of forming new types of populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The State University of Northern Rio de Janeiro (UENF) has been developing a guava (P. guajava L.) breeding program for approximately nine years, generating promising results regarding the composition of several types of study populations (Pessanha et al, 2011;Campos et al, 2013;Oliveira et al, 2013;Campos et al, 2016). In these studies, the production of inbred families was determined as the possibility of forming new types of populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure genetic variability, morphological descriptors of several parts of the plant can be used, such as those related to the leaf, flower, fruit, seeds, and DNA markers. In the case of guava, many variables and methodologies have been adopted successfully to determine genetic diversity among genotypes (Pessanha et al, 2011;Campos et al, 2013;Oliveira et al, 2013;Campos et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guava tree cultivation has been expanding in the state of Rio de Janeiro, especially in the north and northwest regions, as it presents conditions favorable to its cultivation. Under this scenario, the Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro (UENF) has been developing a genetic breeding program of guava (P. guajava L.) over the last nine years, achieving promising results (Pessanha et al, 2011;Campos et al, 2013;Oliveira et al, 2014;Campos et al, 2016;Quintal et al, 2017a, b;Gomes et al, 2017). This study demonstrates that obtaining inbred families is a feasible way of forming superior populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The efficiency of the use of neural networks in breeding programs has been presented in several studies, such as the selection of more productive genotypes of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) [19] and the evaluation of genetic divergence (Vitis vinifera L.) [20], papaya (Carica papaya L.) [1] and guava (Psidium guajava L.) [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often genetic diversity studies have been performed using traditional multivariate techniques such as dendrograms, major components, and canonical variables. However, there is the possibility of carrying out these studies through computational intelligence using artificial neural networks (ANNs) [1,9]. The main advantages of RNAs are their non-parametric approach, tolerance to data loss, and the need for detailed information about the modeling system as a design and genealogies [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%