2014
DOI: 10.1590/0074-0276130353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative cross-sectional study on the prevalence and morbidity of schistosomiasis in a community in northeastern Brazil (1979-2010)

Abstract: A cross-sectional study on the prevalence and morbidity of schistosomiasis was conducted in the main settlement of the municipality of Alhandra, in the southern coastal region of the state of Paraíba, in 2010. The results of this study were compared with the results of a previous study conducted in the same area in 1979. The systematic sampling per family conglomerate included approximately 10% of the resident population in the urban area of Alhandra. Faecal examinations were performed using the Kato-Katz meth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The 27 remaining studies were then divided into four distinct subgroups: (1) analysis of prevalence in different stages of implementation of control programs (Burlandy-Soares et al 2003; Vasconcelos et al 2009; Igreja et al 2010; Barbosa et al 2011; Sarvel et al 2011; Melo et al 2014), (2) comparison of the prevalence of S. mansoni using different methods of laboratory diagnosis (Teles et al 2003; Mendes et al 2005; Enk et al 2008; Siqueira et al 2011; Espirito-Santo et al 2014 a , b ), (3) evaluation of the prevalence of S. mansoni and predictors associated with infection (Bina and Prata, 2003; Massara et al 2004; Couto, 2005; Goncalves et al 2005; Gazzinelli et al 2006; Enk et al 2010; Barbosa et al 2013; Gomes et al 2014; Blanton et al 2015) and (4) analysis of the prevalence of S. mansoni among schoolchildren (Rocha et al 2000; Barbosa et al 2006; Brito et al 2006; Guimaraes and Tavares-Neto, 2006; Massara et al 2006; Palmeira et al 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The 27 remaining studies were then divided into four distinct subgroups: (1) analysis of prevalence in different stages of implementation of control programs (Burlandy-Soares et al 2003; Vasconcelos et al 2009; Igreja et al 2010; Barbosa et al 2011; Sarvel et al 2011; Melo et al 2014), (2) comparison of the prevalence of S. mansoni using different methods of laboratory diagnosis (Teles et al 2003; Mendes et al 2005; Enk et al 2008; Siqueira et al 2011; Espirito-Santo et al 2014 a , b ), (3) evaluation of the prevalence of S. mansoni and predictors associated with infection (Bina and Prata, 2003; Massara et al 2004; Couto, 2005; Goncalves et al 2005; Gazzinelli et al 2006; Enk et al 2010; Barbosa et al 2013; Gomes et al 2014; Blanton et al 2015) and (4) analysis of the prevalence of S. mansoni among schoolchildren (Rocha et al 2000; Barbosa et al 2006; Brito et al 2006; Guimaraes and Tavares-Neto, 2006; Massara et al 2006; Palmeira et al 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three studies were survey-type studies (Burlandy-Soares et al 2003; Barbosa et al 2011; Sarvel et al 2011). Two were prevalence-type studies (Vasconcelos et al 2009; Igreja et al 2010), and one was a cross-sectional study (Melo et al 2014). The Kato-Katz technique was used either alone or combined with other methods for laboratory diagnosis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Além desses fatores, cabe lembrar que tem sido observado por vários autores (30,31) uma manutenção ou aumento da frequência de protozoários com redução de frequência de helmintos, o que também reforça a não adequação do uso do Kato-Katz como técnica única na rotina do diagnóstico de parasitos intestinais, ainda que em pesquisa de campo e reforçado pelo índice de concordância baixo com as demais técnicas.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…2019. ISSN 2317-2460 faixa etária com maior positividade foi de 41 a 50 anos, em que pese que o maior número de amostras foi na faixa de 11 a 20 anos, porém com menor positividade (10,1%) (10) .…”
Section: Original Epidemiologiaunclassified