2014
DOI: 10.1590/0037-8682-0214-2013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory diagnosis of amebiasis in a sample of students from southeastern Brazil and a comparison of microscopy with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for screening of infections with Entamoeba sp.

Abstract: introduction:Epidemiological studies on amebiasis have been reassessed since Entamoeba histolytica and E. dispar were fi rst recognized as distinct species. Because the morphological similarity of these species renders microscopic diagnosis unreliable, additional tools are required to discriminate between Entamoeba species. The objectives of our study were to compare microscopy with ELISA kit (IVD®) results, to diagnose E. histolytica infection, and to determine the prevalence of amebiasis in a sample of stude… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sex-associated distributions of S. mansoni infection in this population indicated a higher prevalence among men, a finding concordant with those of previous studies carried out in the Brazilian states of Pernambuco 15 , Alagoas 16 , Sergipe 17 , and Bahia 18 . The predominance of mansonic schistosomiasis in men is likely due to cultural and behavioral variables rather than male-specific susceptibility 19 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sex-associated distributions of S. mansoni infection in this population indicated a higher prevalence among men, a finding concordant with those of previous studies carried out in the Brazilian states of Pernambuco 15 , Alagoas 16 , Sergipe 17 , and Bahia 18 . The predominance of mansonic schistosomiasis in men is likely due to cultural and behavioral variables rather than male-specific susceptibility 19 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to immunoassay, microscopy has a specificity of 97% and sensitivity of only 20% for E. histolytica/E. dispar identification [5]. When compared to real-time PCR, the immunoassay test has 79% and 96% sensitivity and specificity, respectively [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The worldwide prevalence of E. histolytica, based on microscopic techniques, has been estimated to be 10%; however, it is probably an overestimation of the actual prevalence [5]. The distribution of E. moshkovskii has been scarcely studied, but E. dispar has been found to be ten times more prevalent than E. histolytica [6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bu nedenle E. histolytica'yı saptayan ELISA yöntemlerinin kullanılması gereksiz tedaviyi engellemiş olacaktır (13). Diğer bir çalışmada rastgele seçilen çocuk yaş grubundan 500 olguda mikroskobik olarak %6 oranında belirlenen E.histolytica/E.dispar pozitifliği antijen saptayan ELISA ile %3.2 oranında saptanmıştır (14).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified