2017
DOI: 10.1590/0037-8682-0012-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardization and evaluation of a duplex real-time quantitative PCR for the detection of Leishmania infantum DNA: a sample quality control approach

Abstract: The new duplex VL qPCR protocol indicated good potential for the accurate, fast, and reliable detection of L. infantum DNA, when applied as a complement to the classical diagnostic tools already available, especially in health or research reference centers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SYBR green due to its lower cost, but this method is prone to false–positives as it will visualise any amplified double-stranded DNA [ 178 ]. Use of probe-based real-time PCR increases specificity, thus avoids this issue, and targets can be multiplexed, whereby multiple assays occur in the same reaction, which saves reagents and time and increases throughput [ 179 ]. Real-time PCR was compared to cPCR, and higher sensitivity and specificity, 93.9% and 100%, respectively, for the former was reported compared to two cPCR assays tested (75.6% and 100% for kDNA, and 53.7% and 88.8% for ITS1, respectively) [ 180 ].…”
Section: Methods For the Detection And Diagnosis Of Leishmaniasismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SYBR green due to its lower cost, but this method is prone to false–positives as it will visualise any amplified double-stranded DNA [ 178 ]. Use of probe-based real-time PCR increases specificity, thus avoids this issue, and targets can be multiplexed, whereby multiple assays occur in the same reaction, which saves reagents and time and increases throughput [ 179 ]. Real-time PCR was compared to cPCR, and higher sensitivity and specificity, 93.9% and 100%, respectively, for the former was reported compared to two cPCR assays tested (75.6% and 100% for kDNA, and 53.7% and 88.8% for ITS1, respectively) [ 180 ].…”
Section: Methods For the Detection And Diagnosis Of Leishmaniasismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is carried out via desiccation of the insect digestive system and microscopic examination, whose mean positivity rates range between 0 and 0.9%. However, this technique is hard to operationalize, and new strategies are required that might include molecular methods based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR), resulting in higher sensitivity and specificity [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ]. In such a context, the objective of this study was to carry out L. infantum diagnosis in Lu.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%