Care for unplanned extubation prevention: analysis of the validity of an instrument’s content

Torres, Giovanna Mercado; Nascimento, Eliane Regina Pereira do; Hermida, Patrícia Madalena Vieira; Malfussi, Luciana Bihain Hagemann de; Galetto, Sabrina Guterres da Silva

doi:10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0998

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…When changing positions and transporting, the lack of effective protection or buffer length can easily cause the catheter to slip off. It was consistent with the view of Torres et al (2021). In addition, daily sedation interruption was widely performed.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 80%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Validation of a Risk Assessment Tool for Unplanned Endotracheal Extubation: An Observational Study

Zhang

Liu

2022

Clin Nurs Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to validate and determine the sensitivity and specificity of the risk assessment tool for unplanned endotracheal extubation. Unplanned endotracheal extubation is a common adverse event. The rate of unplanned endotracheal extubation is an indicator to measure patient safety and medical quality. This study was conducted in five intensive care units in a tertiary-A hospital. A total of 227 samples encounters were obtained from 147 unique patients. The content validity was 0.91, and the item content validity ranged from 0.80 to 1.00. Cronbach’s α was .58, the interrater reliability was .93. The area under the curve was 0.89 (95% CI [0.84, 0.94], p < 0.01), the sensitivity was 87.80%, and the specificity was 74.20%. This tool presented good reliability and validity and can be used to assess the risk of unplanned endotracheal extubation in patients with artificial airways.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 80%

“…Due to the economical gap, many areas cannot to be covered. Torres et al (2021) proposed an instrument consisting of 26 interventions to prevent unplanned extubation. However, it may not be an appropriate risk assessment tool for UEE as it was limited in content validity evaluation based on expert consultation.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of a Risk Assessment Tool for Unplanned Endotracheal Extubation: An Observational Study

Zhang

Liu

2022

Clin Nurs Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Some patients may have catheter slippage during the treatment process, affecting the quality of the patient's prognosis [ 3 ]. Catheter slippage, also known as an unplanned extubation, is the accidental shedding of the catheter or the removal of the catheter without the consent of the medical staff, including the extubation caused by incorrect operation of the medical staff [ 4 , 5 ]. Catheter care is an essential component of critical patient care, and the quality of care provided during the treatment is associated with the overall quality of prognosis of hospitalized patients [ 6 , 7 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Clinical Nursing Pathway on Prevention of Catheter Slippage with Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Huang

Zheng

2022

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective. To evaluate the prevention effect of the clinical nursing pathway (CNP) of catheter slippage with intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Methods. Primary databases were electronically searched from the inception up to June 25, 2021. Randomized clinical trials of CNP versus routine nursing for prevention of catheter slippage with ICU patients were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the quality of included studies using the Jadad rating scale. A meta-analysis was conducted using the Cochrane collaboration’s RevMan5.3 software. Results. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The findings of the meta-analysis revealed that the comparison of CNP and routine nursing was applied in ICU patients, the catheter slippage incidence rate odds ratio (OR) was 0.11, with 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.05, 0.24), and the difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.00001 ). The catheter infection rate OR was 0.15, with 95% CI (0.06, 0.37), and the difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.0001 ). The nursing satisfaction OR was 14.06, with 95% CI (5.71, 34.63), and the difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.00001 ). Conclusion. Compared with routine nursing, the application of CNP in ICU patients can effectively reduce the incidence of catheter slippage, reduce the infection rate of the catheter, and improve the nursing satisfaction.

show abstract

“…Unplanned extubation refers to the patient pulling out the pipe without the consent of the medical staff, and also includes the extubation caused by improper medical operation. 16 , 17 According to statistics, 296 nursing adverse events occurred in the East and West region of our hospital from December 2018 to June 2020, of which 49 were unplanned extubation, accounting for 17.75%. The results cannot be ignored.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Empirical Study of Feedforward Control in Unplanned Extubation of Nasogastric Tube

Ma¹,

Pan²,

Dong³

et al. 2023

JMDH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To explore the effect of feedforward control on reducing the incidence of unplanned extubation and improving the quality of catheter nursing. Methods A total of 186 patients with nasogastric tube after gastrointestinal surgery in the eastern region of our hospital from September 2020 to September 2021 were selected as the control group; 186 patients with nasogastric tube after gastrointestinal surgery in the western region of our hospital at the same period were selected as the experimental group. The influencing factors of unplanned extubation in patients with long-term postoperative nasogastric tube were analyzed, and effective preoperative and postoperative health education was conducted. The ratio of unplanned extubation of nasogastric tube and nursing satisfaction of patients in the two groups were compared. Results Patient constraint, perceived pressure score, anxiety score, nasal gastrointestinal canal health education feedback score and indwell tube comfort score were independent risk factors for unplanned extubation. The restraint rate and the incidence of unplanned extubation in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group after intervention, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). The nursing satisfaction of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group after feedforward cognitive intervention. After intervention, serum albumin and gastric PH in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion The safe nursing management method of feed forward control can effectively reduce the incidence of unplanned extubation in inpatients, which is worth further promoting in nursing work.

show abstract

Care for unplanned extubation prevention: analysis of the validity of an instrument’s content

Cited by 4 publications

References 34 publications

Validation of a Risk Assessment Tool for Unplanned Endotracheal Extubation: An Observational Study

Validation of a Risk Assessment Tool for Unplanned Endotracheal Extubation: An Observational Study

The Clinical Nursing Pathway on Prevention of Catheter Slippage with Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

An Empirical Study of Feedforward Control in Unplanned Extubation of Nasogastric Tube

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About