2020
DOI: 10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common Mental Disorders and Contemporary Factors: 1982 Birth Cohort

Abstract: Objective: To describe the association between common mental disorders and socio-demographic variables, smoking habits and stressful events among the 30-year-old members of a 1982 cohort. Method: Mental disorder was analyzed by the Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20). Poisson regression was used to analyze the unadjusted and adjusted associations. Results: Low level of education and stressful events increased the prevalence of mental disorders for both genders. Lower income for women and unemployment for m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Common mental disorders affect the activities of daily living, damaging social, family and work environment relationships. In addition, in the case of young adults, they cause socioeconomic vulnerability, decreasing productive capacity and leading to social isolation and increased use of health services [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common mental disorders affect the activities of daily living, damaging social, family and work environment relationships. In addition, in the case of young adults, they cause socioeconomic vulnerability, decreasing productive capacity and leading to social isolation and increased use of health services [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the absence of associations between educational level and outcomes was another unexpected result, since lower educational levels have been described in the literature as a factor associated with the emotional symptoms assessed (Quadros et al, 2020). This could be partially explained by the positive effect of educational level on mental health, which affects self-esteem, access to quality information on health, and a greater for services and health professionals, which helps in quality of life (Arnberg et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Among the main variables identified as moderators of mental illnesses, the following stand out: women (León-Amenero & Huarcaya-Victoria, 2019); younger people and older adults (Borba et al, 2017;North et al, 2015); lower educational levels (Arnberg, Michel, & Lundin, 2015;Quadros et al, 2020); widowed, divorced, or single marital status (Preto et al, 2018;Santos, Alves, Goldbaum, Cesar, & Gianini, 2019) and direct exposure to the disaster (Tsujiuchi et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies about the populations most frequently affected by CMDs, as well as the understanding of their relationship with the health services, are fundamental for the effective response offered by the SUS. These studies can address important issues for those patients who require multidisciplinary teams and trained managers (2,4,13,18), problems that often extrapolate direct contact with health care, as they demand governmental interventions in elds such as education, social assistance and basic living conditions (3).…”
Section: Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This favors the use of unnecessary tests and medications with high costs from the public health point of view and the possibility of iatrogenic harms or side effects, especially when there is insistence on treating only the physical repercussions, leaving aside important care measures in the psychological and social dimensions (2,3,13). It also states that this problem is greater in peripheral, disadvantaged and vulnerable populations, such as women, non-white-skinned people, older adults, individuals with lower incomes and/or schooling levels, widowers, people with chronic diseases, unemployed individuals and practitioners of religious minorities that are marginalized (2,4,13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%