2020
DOI: 10.1590/0001-3765202020190222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperament and performance of Nellore bulls classified for residual feed intake in a feedlot system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, carcass yield was significantly higher in the nervous animals than in the restless ones, but did not differ from that of calm steers. These results are relevant since a few recent studies have underlined the importance of animal temperament in beef cattle produced in tropical and subtropical regions on grazing systems (Guimarães et al, 2020;Paredes-Sánchez et al, 2020). In this context, cattle temperament is a trait that exerts a marked influence on the beef cattle grazing production system in Colombia because handling on farms has direct repercussions on the profitability of rural enterprises, implying less labor and improved work safety, with consequent benefits for animal welfare (Barrozo et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, carcass yield was significantly higher in the nervous animals than in the restless ones, but did not differ from that of calm steers. These results are relevant since a few recent studies have underlined the importance of animal temperament in beef cattle produced in tropical and subtropical regions on grazing systems (Guimarães et al, 2020;Paredes-Sánchez et al, 2020). In this context, cattle temperament is a trait that exerts a marked influence on the beef cattle grazing production system in Colombia because handling on farms has direct repercussions on the profitability of rural enterprises, implying less labor and improved work safety, with consequent benefits for animal welfare (Barrozo et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%