2019
DOI: 10.1590/0001-3765201920180537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumption of Euterpe edulis fruit by wildlife: implications for conservation and management of the Southern Brazilian Atlantic Forest

Abstract: This study aimed to measure the wildlife consumption of Euterpe edulis fruit and use this data to discuss management possibilities. To estimate infructescence fruit volume consumed, collectors were installed in fruit-bearing palms. To characterize consumption from the ground, samples were placed next to fruiting palms. To identify wildlife and their activities, camera traps were installed in infructescences and on the ground. The results suggested that there was a small fruit surplus (1.8 %), and this finding … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, previous work has shown that birds act more frequently than mammals as seed dispersers of E. edulis (Galetti et al., 2013). Moreover, field studies have shown that secondary dispersal by mammals such as rodents (da Silva & dos Reis, 2019) or ungulates (Keuroghlian & Eaton, 2009) often results in damaged seeds. Trophic rewiring, or the establishment of novel interactions among species with no prior history of co‐occurrence, could compensate the loss of original partners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, previous work has shown that birds act more frequently than mammals as seed dispersers of E. edulis (Galetti et al., 2013). Moreover, field studies have shown that secondary dispersal by mammals such as rodents (da Silva & dos Reis, 2019) or ungulates (Keuroghlian & Eaton, 2009) often results in damaged seeds. Trophic rewiring, or the establishment of novel interactions among species with no prior history of co‐occurrence, could compensate the loss of original partners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artibeus spp., Tapirus terrestris , Dasyprocta spp.) which mostly disperse their seeds (Galetti et al 2013, Silva and Reis 2019). However, some species are not legitimate dispersers, because they either prey upon the seeds, such as the parakeets Brotogeris tirica and Pyrrhura frontalis , or only consume pulp, such as tanagers ( Tangara spp).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possible decrease in fruit provision to such animals due to fruit harvesting or the death of large individuals due to palm heart extraction may trigger changes in community functioning and the overall forest structure, including cascading effects (Barlow et al, 2006;Fernandez et al, 2012;Muler et al, 2014). Some studies have shown that harvesting of palm heart and fruits from palm species, including E. edulis, is associated with a reduction in the occurrence, richness, and permanence time of seeddispersing birds in impacted locations (Galetti and Aleixo, 1998;Moegenburg and Levey, 2003;Muler et al, 2014;Silva and Reis, 2019). As several bird species are also seed dispersers of other late-successional plant species, forest regeneration can be compromised (Rother et al, 2016).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%